Literature DB >> 18064580

Toward understanding nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Johannes Blom1, Li Yin, Annika Lidén, Anders Dolk, Bengt Jeppsson, Lars Påhlman, Lars Holmberg, Olof Nyrén.   

Abstract

Understanding the reasons for nonparticipation in cancer screening may give clues about how to improve compliance. However, limited cooperation has hampered research on nonparticipant profiles. We took advantage of Sweden's comprehensive demographic and health care registers to investigate characteristics of all participants and nonparticipants in a pilot program for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy. A population-based sample of 1986 Swedish residents 59-61 years old was invited. Registers provided information on each individual's gender, country of birth, marital status, education, income, hospital contacts, place of residence, distance to screening center and cancer within the family. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), modeled with multivariable logistic regression, estimated the independent associations between each background factor and the propensity for nonparticipation after control for the effects of other factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Being male (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03-1.57, relative to female), unmarried or divorced (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.23-2.30 and OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14-1.95, respectively, relative to married) and having an income in the lowest tertile (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.27-2.23, relative to highest tertile) was associated with increased nonparticipation. Living in the countryside or in small communities and having a documented family history of colorectal cancer was associated with better participation. Distance to the screening center did not significantly affect participation, nor did recent hospital care consumption or immigrant status. To increase compliance, invitations must appeal to men, unmarried or divorced people and people with low socioeconomic status. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18064580     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  10 in total

1.  Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  Jun-Pyo Myong; Jin-Yong Shin; Su-Jin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The impact of age and gender on papillary thyroid cancer survival.

Authors:  J Jonklaas; G Nogueras-Gonzalez; M Munsell; D Litofsky; K B Ain; S T Bigos; J D Brierley; D S Cooper; B R Haugen; P W Ladenson; J Magner; J Robbins; D S Ross; M C Skarulis; D L Steward; H R Maxon; S I Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  The societal gain of medical development and innovation in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Caroline M den Hoed; Kees Isendoorn; Wouter Klinkhamer; Anshu Gupta; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Are gender-associated differences in quality of life in colorectal cancer patients disease-specific?

Authors:  Johannes Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Verena Mueller; August Zabernigg; Beate Mayrbaeurl; Josef Thaler; Dietmar Ofner; Christian Pegger; Gerhard Rumpold; Barbara Weber; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening participation.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno García
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening awareness among people working in a hospital environment.

Authors:  Spyridon Michopoulos; Efstathios Manios; Helias Kourkoutas; Konstantinos Argyriou; Georgios Leonidakis; Evanthia Zampeli; Kimon Stamatelopoulos; Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Wangmar; Ann-Christin von Vogelsang; Rolf Hultcrantz; Kaisa Fritzell; Yvonne Wengström; Anna Jervaeus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Songjiang district, Shanghai between 2015 and 2017: Evaluation of participation rate and the associated factor.

Authors:  Yiling Wu; Hiroaki Saito; Akihiko Ozaki; Tetsuya Tanimoto; Yonggen Jiang; Peng Yang; Jing Li; Zhiming Zhou; Xiuguo Zhu; Fei Lu; Yoshiaki Kanemoto; Tomohiro Kurokawa; Masaharu Tsubokura; Genming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Decentralized colonoscopic surveillance with high patient compliance prevents hereditary and familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Olle Sjöström; Lars Lindholm; Björn Tavelin; Beatrice Melin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Psychometric properties of the SCREESCO questionnaire used in a colorectal cancer screening programme-A Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Anna Jervaeus; Kaisa Fritzell; Rolf Hultcrantz; Yvonne Wengström; Anders Kottorp
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.431

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.