François Routhier1, R Lee Kirby, Louise Demers, Malgorzata Depa, Kara Thompson. 1. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada. Francois.Routhier@rea.ulaval.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that, in comparison with a control group that received standard care, users of manual wheelchairs who also received the French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) would significantly improve their wheelchair-skills capacity and that these improvements would be retained at 3 months. DESIGN: Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three rehabilitation centers in Montréal, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=39), a sample of convenience. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated to the WSTP or control groups. Participants in both groups received standard care. Participants in the WSTP group also received a mean of 5.9 training sessions (a mean total duration of 5h and 36min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) (Version 3.2) was administered at evaluation at first time period (baseline) (t1), evaluation at second time period (posttraining) (t2) (a mean of 47d after t1), and at evaluation at third time period (follow-up) (t3) (a mean of 101d after t2). RESULTS: At t2, the mean ± SD total percentage WST capacity scores were 77.4%±13.8% for the WSTP group and 69.8%±18.4% for the control group (P=.030). Most of this difference was due to the community-level skills (P=.002). The total and subtotal Wheelchair Skills Test scores at t3 decreased by ≤0.5% from the t2 values, but differences between groups at t3, adjusting for t1, did not reach statistical significance (P≥.017 at a Bonferroni-adjusted α level of .005). CONCLUSION:WSTP training improves wheelchair skills immediately after training, particularly at the community-skills level, but this study did not show statistically significant differences between the groups at 3 months.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that, in comparison with a control group that received standard care, users of manual wheelchairs who also received the French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) would significantly improve their wheelchair-skills capacity and that these improvements would be retained at 3 months. DESIGN: Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three rehabilitation centers in Montréal, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=39), a sample of convenience. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated to the WSTP or control groups. Participants in both groups received standard care. Participants in the WSTP group also received a mean of 5.9 training sessions (a mean total duration of 5h and 36min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) (Version 3.2) was administered at evaluation at first time period (baseline) (t1), evaluation at second time period (posttraining) (t2) (a mean of 47d after t1), and at evaluation at third time period (follow-up) (t3) (a mean of 101d after t2). RESULTS: At t2, the mean ± SD total percentage WST capacity scores were 77.4%±13.8% for the WSTP group and 69.8%±18.4% for the control group (P=.030). Most of this difference was due to the community-level skills (P=.002). The total and subtotal Wheelchair Skills Test scores at t3 decreased by ≤0.5% from the t2 values, but differences between groups at t3, adjusting for t1, did not reach statistical significance (P≥.017 at a Bonferroni-adjusted α level of .005). CONCLUSION: WSTP training improves wheelchair skills immediately after training, particularly at the community-skills level, but this study did not show statistically significant differences between the groups at 3 months.
Authors: Olga J E Kilkens; Marcel W M Post; Annet J Dallmeijer; Henk A M Seelen; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Helen Hoenig; Lawrence R Landerman; Kathy M Shipp; Carl Pieper; Carl Pieper; Margaret Richardson; Nancy Pahel; Linda George Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Olga J E Kilkens; Marcel W M Post; Annet J Dallmeijer; Floris W A van Asbeck; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2005 May-Jun
Authors: Laura A McClure; Michael L Boninger; Michelle L Oyster; Steve Williams; Bethlyn Houlihan; Jesse A Lieberman; Rory A Cooper Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Judith M van Velzen; Sonja de Groot; Marcel W M Post; Johannes Hans R Slootman; Coen A M van Bennekom; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: R Lee Kirby; William C Miller; Francois Routhier; Louise Demers; Alex Mihailidis; Jan Miller Polgar; Paula W Rushton; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; Mike McAllister; Chris Theriault; Kara Thompson; Bonita Sawatzky Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Krista L Best; William C Miller; Janice J Eng; François Routhier; Charles Goldsmith Journal: Can J Occup Ther Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.614
Authors: Lynn A Worobey; R Lee Kirby; Rachel E Cowan; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson; Mary Shea; Allen W Heinemann; Jessica Presperin Pedersen; Michael L Boninger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Emma Williams; Elizabeth Hurwitz; Immaculate Obaga; Brenda Onguti; Adovich Rivera; Tyrone Reden L Sy; R Lee Kirby; Jamie Noon; Deepti Tanuku; Anthony Gichangi; Eva Bazant Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2017-08-17