OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that, in comparison with those in a control group, community-dwelling wheelchair users in Turkey who have completed theWheelchair Skills Training Program have better total percentage performance and safety scores on the Wheelchair Skills Test. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: The study group comprised individuals (n = 24) who have to use a wheelchair for mobility in daily life. The subjects were randomly allocated to training (n = 14) and control groups (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: The training group attended a skill training session three times a week for four weeks. The control group did not participate in the training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At the beginning of the study, subjects underwent a Wheelchair Skills Test (version 4.1), which evaluated their performance and safety for a range of skills. The test was repeated at the end of the study. RESULTS: The mean ± SD total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test performance scores increased significantly in both the training group (P = 0.002) and control group (P = 0.01), although the training group increased to a greater extent (P = 0.034). The training group's mean ± SD total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test safety scores increased significantly (P = 0.001), but there was no significant change in the control group. A statistically significant improvement was found between the total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test safety scores in the training group compared with the control group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Community-living wheelchair users who received wheelchair skills training increased their total performance and safety scores to a greater extent than a control group.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that, in comparison with those in a control group, community-dwelling wheelchair users in Turkey who have completed the Wheelchair Skills Training Program have better total percentage performance and safety scores on the Wheelchair Skills Test. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: The study group comprised individuals (n = 24) who have to use a wheelchair for mobility in daily life. The subjects were randomly allocated to training (n = 14) and control groups (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: The training group attended a skill training session three times a week for four weeks. The control group did not participate in the training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At the beginning of the study, subjects underwent a Wheelchair Skills Test (version 4.1), which evaluated their performance and safety for a range of skills. The test was repeated at the end of the study. RESULTS: The mean ± SD total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test performance scores increased significantly in both the training group (P = 0.002) and control group (P = 0.01), although the training group increased to a greater extent (P = 0.034). The training group's mean ± SD total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test safety scores increased significantly (P = 0.001), but there was no significant change in the control group. A statistically significant improvement was found between the total percentage Wheelchair Skills Test safety scores in the training group compared with the control group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Community-living wheelchair users who received wheelchair skills training increased their total performance and safety scores to a greater extent than a control group.
Authors: R Lee Kirby; William C Miller; Francois Routhier; Louise Demers; Alex Mihailidis; Jan Miller Polgar; Paula W Rushton; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; Mike McAllister; Chris Theriault; Kara Thompson; Bonita Sawatzky Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Krista L Best; William C Miller; Janice J Eng; François Routhier; Charles Goldsmith Journal: Can J Occup Ther Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.614
Authors: François Routhier; R Lee Kirby; Louise Demers; Malgorzata Depa; Kara Thompson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Brodie M Sakakibara; William C Miller; Melanie Souza; Viara Nikolova; Krista L Best Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Lynn A Worobey; R Lee Kirby; Rachel E Cowan; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson; Mary Shea; Allen W Heinemann; Jessica Presperin Pedersen; Michael L Boninger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Edward M Giesbrecht; William C Miller; Janice J Eng; Ian M Mitchell; Roberta L Woodgate; Charles H Goldsmith Journal: Trials Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 2.279