OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between serum P levels on the day of hCG administration and pregnancy outcomes in different responders undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 11,055 women who underwent their first IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles and a subgroup of 4,021 women undergoing frozen-embryo transfer (FET) cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent IVF-ET with the long GnRH agonist protocol. The ovarian response was classified as high (≥ 20 oocytes; n = 2,023), poor (≤ 4 oocytes; n = 827), or intermediate (remaining cases; n = 8,205) according to the number of oocytes retrieved. Clinical outcomes of IVF-ET and FET cycles were analyzed according to plasma P levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs). RESULT(S): Ongoing PRs in fresh cycle were inversely associated with serum P levels on the day of hCG administration for all patients. Different P threshold concentrations were determined according to different ovarian response: We proposed a serum P level of 1.5 ng/mL as the threshold for poor responders, 1.75 ng/mL for intermediate responders, and 2.25 ng/mL for high responders. Our study does not show negative results for elevated P levels on oocyte performance in terms of fertilization, cleavage rate, or PR of FET cycles within different ovarian responses, offering no evidence for a detrimental effect of high P on oocyte quality. CONCLUSION(S): Elevated P levels on the day of hCG administration negatively influence PR regardless of different ovarian responses, although increased P threshold concentration is associated with better ovarian responses. The detrimental effect of P elevation on PR seems to be unrelated to oocyte quality in all responders.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between serum P levels on the day of hCG administration and pregnancy outcomes in different responders undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 11,055 women who underwent their first IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles and a subgroup of 4,021 women undergoing frozen-embryo transfer (FET) cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent IVF-ET with the long GnRH agonist protocol. The ovarian response was classified as high (≥ 20 oocytes; n = 2,023), poor (≤ 4 oocytes; n = 827), or intermediate (remaining cases; n = 8,205) according to the number of oocytes retrieved. Clinical outcomes of IVF-ET and FET cycles were analyzed according to plasma P levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs). RESULT(S): Ongoing PRs in fresh cycle were inversely associated with serum P levels on the day of hCG administration for all patients. Different P threshold concentrations were determined according to different ovarian response: We proposed a serum P level of 1.5 ng/mL as the threshold for poor responders, 1.75 ng/mL for intermediate responders, and 2.25 ng/mL for high responders. Our study does not show negative results for elevated P levels on oocyte performance in terms of fertilization, cleavage rate, or PR of FET cycles within different ovarian responses, offering no evidence for a detrimental effect of high P on oocyte quality. CONCLUSION(S): Elevated P levels on the day of hCG administration negatively influence PR regardless of different ovarian responses, although increased P threshold concentration is associated with better ovarian responses. The detrimental effect of P elevation on PR seems to be unrelated to oocyte quality in all responders.
Authors: Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: N Pereira; R T Elias; P J Christos; A C Petrini; K Hancock; J P Lekovich; Z Rosenwaks Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Micah J Hill; Mae Wu Healy; Kevin S Richter; Eric Widra; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; George Patounakis; Brian W Whitcomb Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Paula C Brady; Daniel J Kaser; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Rachel K Ashby; Stacey A Missmer; Katharine F Correia; Catherine Racowsky Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 3.412