Literature DB >> 22494451

Improved electrogram attenuation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with the Hansen robotic system.

Edward R Duncan1, Malcolm Finlay, Stephen P Page, Ross Hunter, Farai Goromonzi, Laura Richmond, Victoria Baker, Matthew Ginks, Vivienne Ezzat, Mehul Dhinoja, Mark J Earley, Simon Sporton, Richard J Schilling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic catheter ablation aims to improve outcomes after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) through improved lesion quality. This study examined electrogram attenuation as a measure of efficacy in response to robotic (ROB) and manual (MAN) ablation.
METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation as part of an ongoing randomized controlled trial were studied (Clinical Trials Registration NCT01037296). Patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation using NavX (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). Patients were randomized to MAN or ROB catheter ablation using a 3.5-mm irrigated-tip catheter with standardized ablation settings. Bipolar electrogram voltage was measured at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 seconds after ablation onset. Distance from ablation lesion to the left atrial surface on NavX were calculated.
RESULTS: Similar ablation energy was delivered in ROB and MAN groups, achieving comparable rates of PV isolation (100% vs 98%). The bipolar voltages of 4,434 electrograms from 303 ablation lesions (146 ROB, 157 MAN) were measured. At 30 seconds, signal attenuation was greater in the ROB group than MAN (mean 65 ± 4% vs 55 ± 4% of baseline voltage, P < 0.01). A total of 2,064 NavX ablation lesions were assessed (906 ROB and 1,158 MAN). ROB lesions were on average 0.52 mm further inside the geometry than MAN (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic ablation results in greater signal attenuation in man. This is achieved despite manual lesions being closer to the left atrial surface. Catheter stability and constant energy delivery may be key to achieving signal attenuation, rather than increased contact force. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494451     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

2.  Analysis of catheter contact force during atrial fibrillation ablation using the robotic navigation system: results from a randomized study.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Sergio Conti; Michela Casella; Antonio Di Monaco; Eleonora Russo; Stefania Riva; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Giuseppe De Martino; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Left atrial isthmus line ablation using a remote robotic navigation system: feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Rillig; Boris Schmidt; Britta Feige; Erik Wissner; Andreas Metzner; Anita Arya; Shibu Mathew; Hisaki Makimoto; Peter Wohlmuth; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Contemporary Mapping Techniques of Complex Cardiac Arrhythmias - Identifying and Modifying the Arrhythmogenic Substrate.

Authors:  Emmanuel Koutalas; Sascha Rolf; Borislav Dinov; Sergio Richter; Arash Arya; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-03-10

5.  A randomized prospective mechanistic cardiac magnetic resonance study correlating catheter stability, late gadolinium enhancement and 3 year clinical outcomes in robotically assisted vs. standard catheter ablation.

Authors:  Aruna Arujuna; Rashed Karim; Niloufar Zarinabad; Jaspal Gill; Kawal Rhode; Tobias Schaeffter; Matthew Wright; C Aldo Rinaldi; Michael Cooklin; Reza Razavi; Mark D O'Neill; Jaswinder S Gill
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  The comparison between robotic and manual ablations in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Zhang; Nan Jia; Jinzi Su; Jinxiu Lin; Feng Peng; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.