Literature DB >> 22492698

Applying the 2011 St Gallen panel of prognostic markers on a large single hospital cohort of consecutively treated primary operable breast cancers.

O Brouckaert1, A Laenen, J Vanderhaegen, H Wildiers, K Leunen, F Amant, P Berteloot, A Smeets, R Paridaens, M R Christiaens, G Floris, P Moerman, E Van Limbergen, S Peeters, C Weltens, I Vergote, P Neven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many easily measurable and readily available factors are now established as being prognostic in primary operable breast cancer. We here applied the 2011 St Gallen surrogate definition for breast cancer subclassification using tumor grade instead of Ki67. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four thousand three hundred and eighteen consecutive patients who had surgery for primary operable breast cancer (1 January 2000 and 31 December 2009) in UZ Leuven excluding primary metastastic male breast cancers and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Five different surrogate phenotypes were created using the combined expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 together with tumor grade. Disease-free interval (DFI), distant metastastis-free interval (DMFI), locoregional relapse-free interval (LRRFI), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.
RESULTS: Surrogate phenotypes present with significant differences in DFI, DMFI, LRRFI, BCSS and OS. 'Luminal A' tumors presented with the best outcome parameters but the effect weakened at longer follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The four surrogate markers, agreed upon by the 2011 St Gallen consensus, defined five prognostic surrogate phenotypes in a large series of consecutively treated breast cancer patients. Their prognostic value changed with longer follow-up. The added value of gene expression profile over classical pathological assessment remains to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492698     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Van Asten; Laurence Slembrouck; Siel Olbrecht; Lynn Jongen; Olivier Brouckaert; Hans Wildiers; Giuseppe Floris; Erik Van Limbergen; Caroline Weltens; Ann Smeets; Robert Paridaens; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Meredith M Regan; Giuseppe Viale; Beat Thürlimann; Ignace Vergote; Evangelia Christodoulou; Ben Van Calster; Patrick Neven
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-31

2.  Impact of baseline telomere length on survival and chemotherapy related toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant anthracycline containing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sigrid Hatse; Marta Serena; Christof Vulsteke; Kevin Punie; Patrick Neven; Ann Smeets; Annouschka Laenen; Hans Wildiers
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.803

3.  Relative and disease-free survival for breast cancer in relation to subtype: a population-based study.

Authors:  Pamela Minicozzi; Francesca Bella; Angela Toss; Adriano Giacomin; Mario Fusco; Maurizio Zarcone; Rosario Tumino; Fabio Falcini; Rosaria Cesaraccio; Giuseppa Candela; Francesco La Rosa; Massimo Federico; Milena Sant
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Conditional Disease-Free and Overall Survival of 1,858 Young Women with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer and with Participation in a Post-Therapeutic Rehab Programme according to Clinical Subtypes.

Authors:  Jonathan Pruessmann; Telja Pursche; Friederike Hammersen; Alexander Katalinic; Dorothea Fischer; Annika Waldmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Distinct outcomes in patients with different molecular subtypes of inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhou; Yi Yan; Lei Guo; Huiying Ou; Jian Hai; Chaojie Zhang; Zhaoyun Wu; Lili Tang
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  E H Lips; L Mulder; J J de Ronde; I A M Mandjes; B B Koolen; L F A Wessels; S Rodenhuis; J Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine among Young Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Friederike Hammersen; Telja Pursche; Dorothea Fischer; Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Pattern of recurrence of early breast cancer is different according to intrinsic subtype and proliferation index.

Authors:  Nuria Ribelles; Lidia Perez-Villa; Jose Manuel Jerez; Bella Pajares; Luis Vicioso; Begoña Jimenez; Vanessa de Luque; Leonardo Franco; Elena Gallego; Antonia Marquez; Martina Alvarez; Alfonso Sanchez-Muñoz; Luis Perez-Rivas; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Subtype classification for prediction of prognosis of breast cancer from a biomarker panel: correlations and indications.

Authors:  Chuang Chen; Jing-Ping Yuan; Wen Wei; Yi Tu; Feng Yao; Xue-Qin Yang; Jin-Zhong Sun; Sheng-Rong Sun; Yan Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-02-21

10.  Multivariable regression analysis of febrile neutropenia occurrence in early breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy assessing patient-related, chemotherapy-related and genetic risk factors.

Authors:  Alena M Pfeil; Christof Vulsteke; Robert Paridaens; Anne-Sophie Dieudonné; Ruth Pettengell; Sigrid Hatse; Patrick Neven; Diether Lambrechts; Thomas D Szucs; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Hans Wildiers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.