Literature DB >> 22492193

Auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.

Nelli H Salminen1, Hannu Tiitinen, Patrick J C May.   

Abstract

The auditory system codes spatial locations in a way that deviates from the spatial representations found in other modalities. This difference is especially striking in the cortex, where neurons form topographical maps of visual and tactile space but where auditory space is represented through a population rate code. In this hemifield code, sound source location is represented in the activity of two widely tuned opponent populations, one tuned to the right and the other to the left side of auditory space. Scientists are only beginning to uncover how this coding strategy adapts to various spatial processing demands. This review presents the current understanding of auditory spatial processing in the cortex. To this end, the authors consider how various implementations of the hemifield code may exist within the auditory cortex and how these may be modulated by the stimulation and task context. As a result, a coherent set of neural strategies for auditory spatial processing emerges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492193     DOI: 10.1177/1073858411434209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscientist        ISSN: 1073-8584            Impact factor:   7.519


  14 in total

1.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

3.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neuronal interaural level difference response shifts are level-dependent in the rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Kyweriga; Whitney Stewart; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Visual task enhances spatial selectivity in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Joanna Aho; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Michael J Seay; Danielle R Charney; John L Holmes; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Pre-attentive cortical processing of behaviorally perceptible spatial changes in older adults-a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Rudolf Rübsamen; Nicole Richter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Resolution of lateral acoustic space assessed by electroencephalography and psychoacoustics.

Authors:  Jan Bennemann; Claudia Freigang; Erich Schröger; Rudolf Rübsamen; Nicole Richter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-11

10.  Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.