Literature DB >> 22492192

A survey of error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing.

Xiao Yang1, Sriram P Chockalingam, Srinivas Aluru.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Error Correction is important for most next-generation sequencing applications because highly accurate sequenced reads will likely lead to higher quality results. Many techniques for error correction of sequencing data from next-gen platforms have been developed in the recent years. However, compared with the fast development of sequencing technologies, there is a lack of standardized evaluation procedure for different error-correction methods, making it difficult to assess their relative merits and demerits. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of many error-correction methods, and establish a common set of benchmark data and evaluation criteria to provide a comparative assessment. We present experimental results on quality, run-time, memory usage and scalability of several error-correction methods. Apart from providing explicit recommendations useful to practitioners, the review serves to identify the current state of the art and promising directions for future research. AVAILABILITY: All error-correction programs used in this article are downloaded from hosting websites. The evaluation tool kit is publicly available at: http://aluru-sun.ece.iastate.edu/doku.php?id=ecr.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492192     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbs015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  79 in total

Review 1.  From next-generation resequencing reads to a high-quality variant data set.

Authors:  S P Pfeifer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Big data challenges in genome informatics.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Wong
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-01-25

3.  Sequence error storms and the landscape of mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Kirsch; Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of error correction algorithms for Ion Torrent PGM data: application to hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Liting Song; Wenxun Huang; Juan Kang; Yuan Huang; Hong Ren; Keyue Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Traversing the k-mer Landscape of NGS Read Datasets for Quality Score Sparsification.

Authors:  Y William Yu; Deniz Yorukoglu; Bonnie Berger
Journal:  Res Comput Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04

6.  Survey of gene splicing algorithms based on reads.

Authors:  Xiuhua Si; Qian Wang; Lei Zhang; Ruo Wu; Jiquan Ma
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.269

7.  Evaluating the impact of sequencing error correction for RNA-seq data with ERCC RNA spike-in controls.

Authors:  Li Tong; Cheng Yang; Po-Yen Wu; May D Wang
Journal:  IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2016-02

Review 8.  The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Kimberly Robasky; Nathan E Lewis; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  A comparison of tools for the simulation of genomic next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Merly Escalona; Sara Rocha; David Posada
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Representation of k-Mer Sets Using Spectrum-Preserving String Sets.

Authors:  Amatur Rahman; Paul Medevedev
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.