| Literature DB >> 22490508 |
Hui Wei1, Melvin P Tucker, John O Baker, Michelle Harris, Yonghua Luo, Qi Xu, Michael E Himmel, Shi-You Ding.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of the microbial communities that, along with their secreted enzymes, are involved in the natural process of biomass composting may hold the key to breaking the major bottleneck in biomass-to-biofuels conversion technology, which is the still-costly deconstruction of polymeric biomass carbohydrates to fermentable sugars.However, the complexity of both the structure of plant biomass and its counterpart microbial degradation communities makes it difficult to investigate the composting process.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22490508 PMCID: PMC3384452 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Compost setup and sampling. (A) The apparatus for composting of yellow poplar wood chips. (B) Representative samples collected showing morphological changes of composted poplar chips, i.e., size reduction, color darkening, and material softening. (C) Temperature and oxygen concentration measured, as described in Materials and Methods, during composting process. wk: week.
Figure 2Cross-section micrographs of yellow poplar wood chips. (Top panel) Bright field microscopy shows composting effects on the cell wall structure over 24 weeks. (Bottom panel) fluorescence microcopy of the same field labeled by the CtCBM3-GFP probe that binds to cellulose specifically. Increasing fluorescence intensity indicates higher cellulose accessibility to the probe. CtCBM3-GFP: family 3a carbohydrate-binding module tagged by green-fluorescent-protein. wk: week.
Compositional data for the composted materials
| Samples | % Structural Inorganics | % Non-structural inorganics | % Structural Protein | % Sucrose | %Water Extrac table Others | % Ethanol Extractives | % Lignin | % Glucan (cellulose) | Hemicellulose | % Acetyl groups | % Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Xylan | % Mannan | % Galactan | % Arabinan | % Subtotal hemicellulose | |||||||||||
| wk 1 | 26.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 95.9 | |||||||||||
| wk 27 | 35.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 93.7 | |||||||||||
| Changes at wk 27 compared with wk 1 | -50% | -4 9% | -40% | -42% | -47% | ||||||||||
The data are averages of measurement of two replicate samples.
The bold numbers indicate the measurements that increase, while the italic numbers indicate the measurements that decrease during the composting process. wk, week
Figure 3Relative abundance of total genomic DNAs extracted from composted yellow poplar chips, and microbial rDNAs by PCR using primers in Table 2. Samples were collected in composting time at 3, 6, 9, 15, 18, 24, and 27 weeks. (A) Amount of total genomic DNAs above the baseline genomic DNAs in compost at 1 week which was 32.7 ± 2.6 μg/g FW compost (FW: fresh weight). (B) Relative level of bacterial, archaeal and fungal rDNAs. 16 s rDNA was used in bacteria and archaea, and 5.8 s and ITS2 rDNA were used in fungi. The bacterial rDNA abundance at 3 weeks was set as 1- fold; archaeal and fungal rDNA relative level was adjusted to bacterial rDNA abundance at 3 weeks. The insert in (B) shows the archaeal rDNA profiling with a fine scale for the relative levels of archaeal rDNA. Note the bacteria-dominant stage at 9 weeks, whereas the fungi-dominant and overall peak stage occurs at 18 weeks. (C) Relative levels of Trichoderma spp. ITS rDNA. Error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean (S.E. ± mean) for the three replicates.
Domain-level primers used to amplify short-subunit rDNA genes from DNA extracts of biomass compost
| Genes | Primer sequences & reference | Amplicon size(bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archaea | 16 s rDNA | F: TTCCGGTTGATCCYGCCRG | 937 |
| Bacteria | 16 s rDNA | F: TCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT | 466 |
| Fungi | 5.8 s and ITS2 rDNA | F: GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC | 400 |
Subgenus- and species-level primers used to determine the transcriptional levels of fungal cellulolytic genes in biomass compost
| Enzyme type/core species | Target gene/enzyme | Genbank accession No. or reference | Amplicon size (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | - | F: TACCAAHCTGTTGCCTCGGCGG | ~200 | |
| R: GATGAAGAAGGCAGCGAAATGCGATA | ||||
| Cellulase/ | [II] | F: GATGATTACTACGCCAACATGCTG | 77 | |
| R: ACGGCACCGGGTGTGG | ||||
| [III] | F: CTGCAACGAGATGGATATCCTG | 250 | ||
| R: GTGATGATGGTGAAGGTCTTGGAG | ||||
| [IV] | F: ATCAAGGTAGCTCAACATCGGG | 124 | ||
| R: ACCTTATCTTGGAGATTGAGCTTTGCC | ||||
| Hemicellulase/ | [V] | F: CCGAGAAGTTGATGACCTTGTTC | 87 | |
| R: GGTCCAACTCGGGCAACTTT | ||||
| Ligninase/ | LipA/B | F: ATCTCTGCCCACCCTGTCCT | 256 | |
| R: CTGAGCCAGCGAATGAGAGTC | ||||
| LipD | F: CCCGGTCCTCGATGATATCC | 201 | ||
| R: ATGTTCGGGTGGTACGTGGT | ||||
| LipH | F: CGTCCACGGATATCGCTCTCT | 102 | ||
| R: GCGAGGGAGACGCAAATTC | ||||
| LipJ | F: GCCGAGGCACATGAGTCTCTC | 252 | ||
| R: TGTTCGGGTGGAAATTGGTC | ||||
Note: the group primers targeting specific functional protein-encoding genes:
[I]. Orpinomyces spp. endo-1,4-glucanase gene: O. sp. PC-2, U97153; O. joyonii, AF015248.
[II]. Trichoderma spp. cellobiohydrolase I gene (cbh1): T. koningii, X69976; T. reesei, DD393553-DD393571; T. sp. FJ026620; T. viride, AY368686.
[III]. Trichoderma spp. endo-β-1,4-glucanase I gene (egl1): T. longibrachiatum, X60652; T. reesei, AY928809; T. viride, AY343986
[IV]. Trichoderma spp. β-glucosidase 1 gene (bgl1): T. reesei, U09580; T. sp. SSL, FJ040193; T. viride, AY368687
[V]. Trichoderma spp. xyn1 and xyn2: T.reesei, X69573 (xyn1), U24191 (xyn2); T. harzianum, EU821597 (xyn2); T. pseudokoningii, EU360941 (xyn2).
Figure 4Transcriptional level of representative cellulolytic functional genes in . (A) Xylanases 1 and 2 (xyn1 and xyn2). (B) Cellobiohydrolase I (cbh1), endoglucanase I (egl1) and β-glucosidase 1 (bgl1) were used in a set of representative species of Trichoderma genus. The gene expression level at each sampling time point of composting was first normalized with the Trichoderma sp. ITS rRNA, and then compared to their respective expression levels at 3 weeks (each of which was set as 1 fold). The primers for these genes were described in Table 3. Note that identical scales in the X axis of panels A-B allows a direct visual comparison of the magnitude of changes in gene expression levels.
Figure 5Transcriptional level of representative lignin degradation-related genes during the composting of yellow poplar chips. (A) Manganese peroxidase (MnP1 and MnP2). (B) Lignin peroxidase (LiP A/B, D, H and J). Gene sequences of fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium were used to design primers for real-time RT-PCR. For each gene the expression level at each sampling time point of composting was compared to its expression level at 3 weeks (which was set as 1 fold).
Figure 6Total cellulase and hemicellulase activities agaist model substrates measured in composted yellow poplar, as a function of composting time. Activities are normalized to solids content of the compost sample and are averaged values from three replicates. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (* for p < 0.05; ** for p < 0.01). Fluorogenic model substrates were used for the cellulase assay: MUC, 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-cellobioside; MUG, 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucoside. Hemicellulase assays utilized the respective 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glycosides of the monosaccharides D-xylose, D-mannose, D-arabinose, and D-galactose.
The fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) mixing ratios, and the estimated recalcitrance index (RI) for yellow poplar chips and mown lawn clippings using in setting up the compost of this study
| Compost feedstocks | FW mixing ratio | water % | DW mixing ratio | Estimated recalcitrance index * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow Poplar | 1 | 7% | 6 | 0.56 |
| Mown lawn | 1 | 85% | 1 | 0.25 |
Notes: *The RI value of yellow poplar chips is estimated to be 0.56, an average for hardwood biomass, while that of mown lawn clippings is estimated to be 0.25, a typical value for herbaceous plants such as corn stover and big bluestem grass biomass (see review [8]).