| Literature DB >> 22489119 |
Yang Yao1, Xu-Zhen Cheng1, Li-Xia Wang1, Su-Hua Wang1, Guixing Ren1.
Abstract
Interest in edible beans as nutraceuticals is increasing. In the present study, the individual phenolic acids, the total phenolic content (TPC), the total flavonoid content (TFC), and the antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of 13 varieties of rice beans from China were investigated. Eight phenolic compounds (catechin, epicatechin, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, vitexin, isovitexin, sinapic acid, quercetin) were analyzed on an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) mass spectrometry (MS) system. The rice bean varieties had significant differences in total phenolic compounds (ranging from 123.09 ± 10.35 to 843.75 ± 30.15 μg/g), in TPC (ranging from 3.27 ± 0.04 to 6.43 ± 0.25 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g), in TFC (ranging from 55.95 ± 11.16 to 320.39 ± 31.77 mg catechin (CE)/g), in antioxidant activity (ranging from 39.87 ± 1.37 to 46.40 ± 2.18 μM·TE/g), in α-glucosidase inhibition activity (ranging from 44.32 ± 2.12 to 68.71 ± 2.19) and in advanced glycation end products formation inhibition activity (ranging from 34.11 ± 0.59 to 75.75 ± 0.33). This study is the first report on phytochemistry and biological activities in rice beans.Entities:
Keywords: advanced glycation end products; antioxidant; rice bean; α-glucosidase inhibitory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22489119 PMCID: PMC3317682 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13032707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Content of individual phenolic compounds in rice beans (in μg/g).
| Ferulic acid | Sinapic acid | Catechin | Epicatechin | Vitexin | Isovitexin | Quercetin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0000318 | 5.67 ± 0.49 i | 11.57 ± 0.96 j | nd | 53.48 ± 3.29 f,g | nd | 26.46 ± 1.92 e,f | 7.45 ± 0.68 g | 18.46 ± 1.25 d | 123.09 ± 10.35 f |
| D0000708 | 17.84 ± 1.28 e,f,g | 13.20 ± 1.32 j | 17.21 ± 1.24 d | 142.19 ± 8.96 b | 4.37 ± 0.48 d | 30.68 ± 1.84 e | nd | 27.15 ± 2.13 b,c | 252.64 ± 13.62 e |
| D0000294 | 16.58 ± 1.48 f,g | 28.15 ± 1.45 f,g | 19.68 ± 1.53 c,d | 78.51 ± 5.47 d,e | 6.89 ± 0.96 c | nd | 0.43 ± 0.03 h | 10.77 ± 0.98 e | 150.24 ± 17.28 f |
| D0000874 | 31.25 ± 2.41 b | 49.71 ± 2.48 c | 21.35 ± 1.64 c | 132.68 ± 11.20 b | 11.24 ± 1.04 a | 33.13 ± 1.64 e | 27.08 ± 1.59 e,f | 26.53 ± 1.63 b,c | 332.97 ± 14.54 d |
| D0000955 | 21.74 ± 1.92 d,e | 25.30 ± 1.93 g,h | 17.33 ± 1.38 d | 69.33 ± 5.42 e,f | 1.35 ± 0.24 e | 30.64 ± 1.88 e | 118.04 ± 15.75 d | 35.46 ± 2.35 a | 219.19 ± 21.32 e |
| D0000958 | 25.32 ± 1.47 c,d | 31.48 ± 2.10 e,f | 18.29 ± 2.53 c,d | 182.64 ± 12.03 a | 5.49 ± 0.79 d | 40.16 ± 1.29 e | nd | 29.31 ± 2.47 b | 332.69 ± 25.67 d |
| D0000699 | 20.09 ± 2.21 e,f | 54.63 ± 1.48 b | 25.32 ± 1.29 b | 89.72 ± 4.12 c,d | 7.13 ± 0.65 c | 192.53 ± 16.68 c | 105.34 ± 8.74 d | 12.35 ± 1.08 e | 507.11 ± 19.44 c |
| D0000090 | 39.72 ± 2.69 a | 78.32 ± 3.59 a | 27.35 ± 1.97 b | 68.53 ± 3.95 e,f | 2.29 ± 0.11 e | 401.84 ± 21.57 a | 190.29 ± 3.69 b | 35.41 ± 2.84 a | 843.75 ± 30.15 a |
| D0001152 | 28.15 ± 2.45 b,c | 19.65 ± 1.29 i | 8.42 ± 0.86 e | 43.59 ± 6.87 g | nd | 250.71 ± 17.62 b | 271.97 ± 9.98 a | 24.63 ± 2.36 c | 647.12 ± 16.32 b |
| D0000310 | 21.36 ± 1.40 d,e | 21.08 ± 1.46 h,i | 31.08 ± 1.98 a | 175.39 ± 14.2 a,1 | 9.77 ± 0.72 b | 186.39 ± 18.19 c | 33.27 ± 1.08 e | 17.1 ± 1.28 d | 495.44 ± 19.50 c |
| D0000329 | 19.73 ± 2.10 e,f | 41.15 ± 2.21 d | 11.27 ± 1.27 e | 54.28 ± 8.60 f,g | 4.68 ± 0.38 d | nd | 23.99 ± 1.31 e,f | nd | 155.10 ± 14.29 f |
| D0000809 | 15.40 ± 1.07 g,h | 48.07 ± 2.08 c | 8.16 ± 0.75 e | 24.76 ± 1.29 h | 7.10 ± 0.56 c | 73.81 ± 2.81 d | 18.85 ± 0.46 f,g | 30.54 ± 2.69 b | 226.69 ± 28.17 e |
| D0000651 | 11.29 ± 1.14 h | 35.86 ± 2.74 e | 8.41 ± 0.86 e | 101.17 ± 8.39 c | nd | 232.92 ± 17.16 b | 143.11 ± 5.51 c | nd | 232.76 ± 15.46 e |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples. Means in a column with different letters differ significantly (p < 0.01).
Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of rice beans.
| TPC | TFC | |
|---|---|---|
| D0000318 | 3.27 ± 0.04 h | 55.95 ± 11.16 h |
| D0000708 | 5.02 ± 0.14 c,d | 211.76 ± 25.53 c,d |
| D0000294 | 5.14 ± 0.09 c,d | 209.75 ± 22.79 c,d |
| D0000874 | 6.02 ± 0.25 a,b | 294.52 ± 22.05 a,b |
| D0000955 | 3.92 ± 0.13 g,f,h | 63.99 ± 37.44 g,h |
| D0000958 | 5.52 ± 0.24 d,e,f | 167.69 ± 12.89 d,e |
| D0000699 | 5.44 ± 0.15 b,c | 254.83 ± 23.96 b,c |
| D0000090 | 6.43 ± 0.25 a | 320.39 ± 31.77 a |
| D0001152 | 4.28 ± 0.10 e,f,g | 146.20 ± 23.76 e,f |
| D0000310 | 4.95 ± 0.15 c,d,e | 218.80 ± 12.95 c,d |
| D0000329 | 4.11 ± 0.14 e,f,g | 140.35 ± 13.78 e,f |
| D0000809 | 3.75 ± 0.04 g,h | 115.84 ± 13.32 e,f,g |
| D0000651 | 3.89 ± 0.14 g,f,h | 112.00 ± 29.97 f,g |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples. TPC was expressed as mg GAE/g. TFC was expressed as μg CE/g. Means in a column with different letters differ significantly (p < 0.01).
Biological activities of rice beans.
| DPPH | α-Glucosidase inhibition(%) | BSA-GLUCOSE | BSA-MGO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0000318 | 39.87 ± 1.37 e | 52.49 ± 1.88 e,f | 36.15 ± 0.52 a | 34.11 ± 0.59 j |
| D0000708 | 45.76 ± 1.42 a,b | 61.82 ± 2.68 b,c | 61.42 ± 0.04 f | 58.82 ± 1.48 c,d |
| D0000294 | 41.08 ± 2.11 c,d,e | 66.06 ± 2.79 a,b | 60.86 ± 0.70 f | 48.28 ± 1.72 f |
| D0000874 | 46.40 ± 2.18 a | 60.01 ± 3.51 c,d | 71.63 ± 0.73 b | 55.32 ± 1.27 e |
| D0000955 | 40.87 ± 0.99 c,d,e | 55.45 ± 2.46 d,e | 57.27 ± 0.68 g | 45.96 ± 1.16 f,g |
| D0000958 | 43.71 ± 1.40 a,b,c,d | 49.11 ± 2.65 f,g | 55.02 ± 0.34 h | 42.10 ± 1.67 I,h |
| D0000699 | 44.55 ± 1.34 a,b,c | 47.16 ± 2.49 f,g | 69.20 ± 0.28 c | 59.70 ± 1.77 c |
| D0000090 | 46.20 ± 1.68 a | 46.69 ± 3.71 f,g | 70.34 ± 0.51 c | 72.06 ± 0.85 a |
| D0001152 | 45.24 ± 2.09 a,b | 60.06 ± 2.70 c,d | 75.75 ± 0.33 a | 66.23 ± 0.87 b |
| D0000310 | 46.29 ± 2.03 a | 68.71 ± 2.19 a | 65.54 ± 0.47 d | 57.25 ± 0.45 c,d,e |
| D0000329 | 42.87 ± 1.61 a,b,c,d,e | 48.68 ± 2.15 f,g | 61.91 ± 0.44 f | 43.65 ± 0.61 g,h |
| D0000809 | 42.13 ± 1.45 b,c,d,e | 45.23 ± 2.28 g | 53.34 ± 0.19 i | 56.98 ± 0.69 d,e |
| D0000651 | 40.14 ± 1.58 d,e | 44.32 ± 2.12 g | 63.51 ± 0.84 e | 40.47 ± 0.41 i |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples. The anti-DPPH capacity was expressed as μM TE/g. Means in a column with different letters differ significantly (p < 0.01). Bovine serum albumin (BSA), D-glucose and methylglyoxal (MGO), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH).
Correlation coefficient of total phenolics acid, DPPH, α-glucosidase inhibition, BSA-MGO, BSA-Glucose and tyrosinase inhibition assay.
| TPC | TFC | DPPH | α-Glucosidase inhition | BSA-Glucose | BSA-MGO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | 0.612 | 0.617 | 0.707 | −0.024 | 0.663 | 0.825 |
| TPC | 0.980 | 0.750 | 0.216 | 0.668 | 0.670 | |
| TFC | 0.792 | 0.200 | 0.667 | 0.684 | ||
| DPPH | 0.323 | 0.697 | 0.778 | |||
| α-Glucosidase inhibition | 0.193 | 0.156 | ||||
| BSA-Glucose | 0.728 |
Correlation is significant at p < 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at p < 0.01 level (2-tailed).