Literature DB >> 22488465

Genetics blogs as a public health tool: assessing credibility and influence.

L Wagner1, R Paquin, S Persky.   

Abstract

The Internet is becoming an important source of information about genetics and holds promise for public health applications. However, the public has concerns about the credibility of online genetics information. We conducted a content analysis of genetics blogs (n = 94). Specifically, we assessed the prevalence of various genetics-related topics and perceived credibility indicators. The relationship between content indicators, credibility indicators, and blog influence, measured as links between blogs, was evaluated. Coverage of issues related to health or self-knowledge (31%) and life science (26%) was most common among genetics blogs. In terms of credibility indicators, most blogs disclosed authors' full names (81%) and biographical information (67%). Many blog authors reported having genetics (67%) or life science expertise (59%). However, only 7% of blogs were affiliated with educational or medical institutions. Overall, blogs that focused on ancestry, that had authors with life science expertise, and that posted more frequently tended to be more influential. Findings suggest that life scientists and those who blog frequently may figure more centrally in shaping the genetics information available to the public via blogs. There is room for institutions that are likely to be perceived as credible sources of genetics information to assume a greater presence through blogs.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22488465      PMCID: PMC3362290          DOI: 10.1159/000336537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  8 in total

Review 1.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Health and medical blog content and its relationships with blogger credentials and blog host.

Authors:  Lorraine R Buis; Serena Carpenter
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

3.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Variation in health blog features and elements by gender, occupation, and perspective.

Authors:  Edward Alan Miller; Antoinette Pole; Clancey Bateman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05-24

6.  Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics.

Authors:  Jay M Bernhardt; Ruth Ann Weaver Lariscy; Roxanne L Parrott; Kami J Silk; Elizabeth M Felter
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep

7.  Content of weblogs written by health professionals.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Elinore J Kaufman; David A Asch; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.

Authors:  Christina R Lachance; Lori A H Erby; Beth M Ford; Vincent C Allen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.