Literature DB >> 22488281

Identifying multiplanar knee laxity profiles and associated physical characteristics.

Sandra J Shultz1, William N Dudley, Yanfang Kong.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A single measure of knee laxity (ie, measurement of laxity in a single plane of motion) is probably inadequate to fully describe how knee joint laxity is associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize interparticipant differences in the absolute and relative magnitudes of multiplanar knee laxity (ie, sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes) and examine physical characteristics that may contribute to these differences.
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 140 participants (90 women, 50 men). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Using cluster analysis, we grouped participants into distinct multiplanar knee laxity profiles based on the absolute and relative magnitudes of their anterior knee laxity (AKL), genu recurvatum (GR), and varusvalgus (VV) and internal-external rotation (IER) knee laxity. Using multinomial logistic regression, we then examined associations between the different laxity profile clusters and physical characteristics of sex, age, activity level, general joint laxity, body mass index, thigh strength, and 8 measures of lower extremity anatomical alignment.
RESULTS: Six clusters were identified: low (LOW), moderate (MOD) and high (HIGH) laxity overall and disproportionally higher VV/IER (MOD(VV/IER)), GR (HIGH(GR)), and AKL (HIGH(AKL)) laxity. Once all other physical characteristics were accounted for, the LOW cluster was more likely to be older, with longer femur length. Clusters with greater magnitudes of VV and IER laxity were more likely to be younger and to have lower body mass index, smaller Q-angle, and shorter femur length (MOD, HIGH, MOD(VV/IER)) and less thigh strength (HIGH). The HIGH(GR) cluster was more likely to be female and to have a smaller tibiofemoral angle and longer femur length. The HIGH(AKL) cluster was more likely to have greater hip anteversion and navicular drop.
CONCLUSIONS: The absolute and relative magnitudes of a person's multiplanar knee laxity are not always uniform across planes of motion and can be influenced by age, body composition, thigh strength, and structural alignment. Except in HIGH(GR), sex was not a significant predictor of cluster membership once other physical characteristics were taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22488281      PMCID: PMC3418127          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  64 in total

1.  Ligamentous laxity and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament tears: a gender-based comparison.

Authors:  Tamara A Scerpella; Timothy J Stayer; Brian Z Makhuli
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Measurement of varus-valgus and internal-external rotational knee laxities in vivo--Part I: assessment of measurement reliability and bilateral asymmetry.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Yohei Shimokochi; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Randy J Schmitz; Bruce D Beynnon; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Genu recurvatum syndrome.

Authors:  J K Loudon; H L Goist; K L Loudon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  A preliminary multifactorial approach describing the relationships among lower extremity alignment, hip muscle activation, and lower extremity joint excursion.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Richard M Luecht; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Femoral neck anteversion: values, development, measurement, common problems.

Authors:  G Gulan; D Matovinović; B Nemec; D Rubinić; J Ravlić-Gulan
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2000-12

7.  Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: implications for multicenter studies.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Thomas C Windley; Anthony S Kulas; Timothy L Botic; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Alignment Characteristics and Anterior Knee Joint Laxity.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Beverly J Levine
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Effects of transverse and frontal plane knee laxity on hip and knee neuromechanics during drop landings.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Multiple risk factors related to familial predisposition to anterior cruciate ligament injury: fraternal twin sisters with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T R Lynch; G D Myer; K R Ford; R C Gwin; R S Heidt
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  9 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Changes in fatigue, multiplanar knee laxity, and landing biomechanics during intermittent exercise.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; John R Cone; Robert A Henson; Melissa M Montgomery; Michele L Pye; Amanda J Tritsch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Landing biomechanics in participants with different static lower extremity alignment profiles.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Multiplanar Knee Laxity and Perceived Function During Activities of Daily Living and Sport.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Taylor; Hsin-Min Wang; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Continuous moderate intensity versus discontinuous high intensity treadmill running on anterior cruciate ligament laxity and hamstrings flexibility in eumenorrheic women.

Authors:  Michael J Landram; Mary K Halligan
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2020-12

7.  Risk Factors Associated With a Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury to the Contralateral Knee After Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in High School and College Female Athletes: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Annabelle P Davey; Pamela M Vacek; Ryan A Caldwell; James R Slauterbeck; Mack G Gardner-Morse; Timothy W Tourville; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 7.010

8.  Combined anterior and rotational laxity measurements allow characterizing personal knee laxity profiles in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Romain Seil; Tim Meyer; Hélène Agostinis; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluation of skeletal muscle activity during foot training exercises using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kanayama; Junsuke Nakase; Takafumi Mochizuki; Kazuki Asai; Rikuto Yoshimizu; Mitsuhiro Kimura; Seigo Kinuya; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.