Literature DB >> 22487622

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy learning curve experience seen in a single institution.

Elyssa J Feinberg1, Emmanuel Agaba, Michelle L Feinberg, Diego Camacho, Pratibha Vemulapalli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is laparoscopic surgery done by one incision through the umbilicus. Cholecystectomy lends itself well to a SILS approach. As these procedures have become more widely adapted, it is important to determine the approximate learning curve to decrease two surgical endpoints: (1) time to completion of the procedure; and (2) decreased incidence of conversion.
METHODS: We prospectively reviewed our series of 50 cholecystectomies done using the SILS approach between May 2008 to September 2008. All cases were performed by two advanced laparoscopic surgeons at a single institution. Data was collected immediately after the case and entered into an Excel database. Cases were performed by insufflating the abdomen with a Veress needle through the umbilicus followed by placement of 5-mm ports at the umbilicus.
RESULTS: Patient ages ranged between 21 and 82 years with a median age of 45 years. Body mass index (BMI) range was 21 to 42 kg/m with a mean of 30 kg/m. Average length of time for cases was 1 hour 9 minutes with a range between 55 minutes and 120 minutes. The average length of time for the first 25 cases was 80 minutes. When compared with cases 26 to 50 the average length of time was 60 minutes (P<0.05). The conversion rate to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 10%. Conversion was accomplished through the addition of a 5-mm port elsewhere on the abdominal cavity. After the tenth case, the incidence of conversion went down to zero. When conversions were further stratified, they occurred within each individual surgeon's first ten cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for successful consistent completion of SILS cholecystectomy cases appears to be after 25 cases. In addition, conversion rates drop dramatically after the first ten cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487622     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824799ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  12 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefano Partelli; Giuliano Barugola; Alberto Sartori; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pierre Allemann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Transvaginal cholecystectomy learning curve.

Authors:  Stephanie G Wood; Feng Dai; Susan Dabu-Bondoc; Hosni Mikhael; Nalini Vadivelu; Andrew Duffy; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinical results between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-matched analysis in single institution.

Authors:  Gum O Jung; Dong Eun Park; Kwon Mook Chae
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-11-27

5.  Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons.

Authors:  Hisanori Miki; Yosuke Fukunaga; Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of clinical trials of surgical interventions for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Double incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DILC) with routinary intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) : less trauma, same safety. Report on 30 consecutive non-selected cases.

Authors:  Dario D'Antonio; Boris Franzato; Grazia Fusco; Mariangela Ruperto; Aldo Dal Pozzo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-02-10

9.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

10.  Competence acquisition for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gary B Deutsch; Sandeep Anantha Sathyanarayana; Matthew Giangola; Meredith Akerman; George DeNoto; Jonathan D S Klein; Harry Zemon; Eugene Rubach
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.