Literature DB >> 22487491

Co-producing novel wound care products for Epidermolysis bullosa; an empirical case study of the use of surrogates in the design and prototype development process.

Patricia Grocott1, Rebecca Blackwell, Conchita Currie, Elizabeth Pillay, Glenn Robert.   

Abstract

The Woundcare for Epidermolysis bullosa (WEB) project aims to enable people with Epidermolysis bullosa (EB), their carers and clinicians to co-produce wound care products to meet their needs. EB is an inherited disorder causing extensive, painful skin blistering and wounds. It is relatively rare, with approximately 300 000 patients worldwide, but it incurs high costs (up to £50 000 per month on products alone). During the course of four workshops, adults with EB, their carers and specialist nurses gave detailed accounts of their experiences with pre-sized, pre-shaped dressings, including the need to patchwork individual dressings over large areas of broken skin. Five themes were identified from the workshop data relating to the limitations of existing products for EB wounds: dressing fit, stability, comfort, temperature and exudate. Novel designs were generated from these themes and although the intention was to develop the designs iteratively with the workshop participants, issues arose necessitating the interim use of surrogates. Our account of the design process is given, presenting the arguments for and against the use of surrogates, with suggestions for incorporating surrogate input into product development in a way that does not undermine the integrity of patient experiences or the co-production process.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487491      PMCID: PMC7950886          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  11 in total

1.  The iterative use of economic evaluation as part of the process of health technology assessment.

Authors:  M Sculpher; M Drummond; M Buxton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-01

Review 2.  Living in dressings and bandages: findings from workshops with people with Epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Patricia Grocott; Rebecca Blackwell; Heather Weir; Elizabeth Pillay
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Are family members suitable proxies for transitional care unit residents when collecting satisfaction information?

Authors:  Nicholas Castle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  A model of user engagement in medical device development.

Authors:  Patricia Grocott; Heather Weir; Mala Bridgelal Ram
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2007

Review 5.  The burden of chronic wounds in the UK.

Authors:  John Posnett; Peter J Franks
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2008 Jan 22-28

6.  Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient.

Authors:  Paul Bate; Glenn Robert
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-10

Review 7.  Epidermolysis bullosa. Part 1: causes, presentation and complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pillay
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2008 Mar 13-26

8.  Woundcare Research for Appropriate Products (WRAP): validation of the TELER method involving users.

Authors:  Natasha Browne; Patricia Grocott; Sarah Cowley; Janice Cameron; Carol Dealey; Anne Keogh; Ann Lovatt; Kathryn Vowden; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 9.  The representation of healthcare end users' perspectives by surrogates in healthcare decisions: a literature review.

Authors:  Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah; Alexandra Farrow; Ian Robinson
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2009-09-09

10.  The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives.

Authors:  Arthur G Money; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis; Michael P Craven; Jennifer L Martin; Terry Young
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.