Literature DB >> 19740114

The representation of healthcare end users' perspectives by surrogates in healthcare decisions: a literature review.

Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah1, Alexandra Farrow, Ian Robinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The representation of end users' perspectives in healthcare decisions requires involvement of their surrogates when the end users, i.e. certain patients, elderly people, children and people with disabilities, are unable to present their views. AIMS: To review critical issues, and the advantages and disadvantages of involving surrogates in representing end users' perspectives in healthcare decisions.
METHODS: A systematic review of literature published in peer-reviewed journals from 1990 to 2005.
RESULTS: Findings show that surrogates are used widely in health care and that they are necessary to represent end users' perspectives in healthcare decisions when the latter are unable to do so themselves. Critical issues in using surrogates include key ethical, social, cultural, legal and medico-technological factors; ascertaining the best interest of end users; potential conflict of interest; possible biased decisions and the burden on surrogates. The key advantage of surrogate involvement in healthcare decisions is their ability to represent end users' needs, values and wishes. The main disadvantages include potential discrepancies between the decisions and conclusions of surrogates and end users; the failure of surrogates to predict end users' preferences accurately and the lack of certainty that useful information will be obtained through the surrogacy process.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review has revealed that the involvement of surrogates is an additional vital way to represent end users' perspectives in healthcare decisions where for a range of reasons their opinions are unable to be effectively ascertained. However, because of the heterogeneity of surrogates and end users, the selection of appropriate surrogates and deploying surrogate decisions require particularly careful consideration of their value in individual cases; thus, subsequent decision-making must be reviewed on a case-to-case basis to seek to ensure that the best interests, needs and wishes of the end user are fully and accurately represented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19740114     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00674.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  5 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amrita Mukherjee; Alicia A Livinski; Joseph Millum; Steffany Chamut; Shahdokht Boroumand; Timothy J Iafolla; Margo R Adesanya; Bruce A Dye
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 2.  Co-producing novel wound care products for Epidermolysis bullosa; an empirical case study of the use of surrogates in the design and prototype development process.

Authors:  Patricia Grocott; Rebecca Blackwell; Conchita Currie; Elizabeth Pillay; Glenn Robert
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Advance Care Plans and the Potentially Conflicting Interests of Bedside Patient Agents: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Denise P Craig; Robin Ray; Desley Harvey; Mandy Shircore
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-08-06

4.  Methods to identify, study and understand end-user participation in HIT development.

Authors:  Anna Marie Høstgaard; Pernille Bertelsen; Christian Nøhr
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Multidisciplinary Clinicians and the Relational Autonomy of Persons with Neurodegenerative Disorders and an Advance Care Plan: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Denise Patricia Craig; Robin Ray; Desley Harvey; Mandy Shircore
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.