Literature DB >> 22487094

Time-course of arm lymphedema and potential risk factors for progression of lymphedema after breast conservation treatment for early stage breast cancer.

Voichita Bar Ad1, Pinaki R Dutta, Lawrence J Solin, Wei-Ting Hwang, Kay See Tan, Stefan Both, Andrea Cheville, Eleanor E R Harris.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the progression of arm lymphedema (ALE) after the initial presentation among patients receiving breast conservation therapy for early stage breast cancer and to identify potential risk factors contributing to ALE progression. The study sample was the 266 stage I or II breast cancer patients with documented ALE who underwent breast conservation therapy that included lumpectomy, axillary staging followed by radiation therapy. ALE were graded according to a difference of 0.5-2 cm (mild), 2.1-3 cm (moderate), and >3 cm (severe) in the circumference between the upper extremities for the treated and untreated sides. ALE at presentation was scored as mild, moderate, and severe in 109 (41%), 125 (47%), and 32 (12%) patients, respectively. One third of patients with ALE progressed to a more severe grade of lymphedema at 5 years of follow-up. Age older than 65 years at the time of breast cancer treatment was associated with higher risk of ALE progression when compared 65 year age or younger (p = 0.04). The patients who had regional lymph node irradiation including posterior axillary boost were at higher risk of lymphedema progression than the patients treated with whole breast irradiation only (p = 0.001). Progression of ALE is a common occurrence. The current study provides support for the utility of routine arm measurements after breast cancer treatment to facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment of ALE.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487094     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01229.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

1.  The results of the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy and the determination of predictive factors for response to treatment in patients with breast cancer related-lymphedema.

Authors:  Dilek Keskin; Meltem Dalyan; Sibel Ünsal-Delialioğlu; Ülkü Düzlü-Öztürk
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-01-03

2.  Differences in limb volume trajectories after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Betty Smoot; Bruce A Cooper; Yvette Conley; Kord Kober; Jon D Levine; Judy Mastick; Kimberly Topp; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Long-term effects of complex decongestive therapy in breast cancer patients with arm lymphedema after axillary dissection.

Authors:  Jung Min Hwang; Ji Hye Hwang; Tae Won Kim; Seung Yeol Lee; Hyun Ju Chang; In Ho Chu
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-10-29

4.  Worse and worse off: the impact of lymphedema on work and career after breast cancer.

Authors:  John Boyages; Senia Kalfa; Ying Xu; Louise Koelmeyer; Helen Mackie; Hector Viveros; Lucy Taksa; Paul Gollan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-17

Review 5.  The impact of early detection and intervention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; Douglas W Arthur; David Wazer; Atif Khan; Sheila Ridner; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Na Yoo; Youn-Soo Cheong; Yu-Sun Min; Sang-Woo Lee; Ho Yong Park; Tae-Du Jung
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29

7.  Clinical effectiveness of decongestive treatments on excess arm volume and patient-centered outcomes in women with early breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eunice Jeffs; Emma Ream; Cath Taylor; Debra Bick
Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep       Date:  2018-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.