| Literature DB >> 22485135 |
M Ann Kelly1, Simon D Rees, M Zafar I Hydrie, A Samad Shera, Srikanth Bellary, J Paul O'Hare, Sudhesh Kumar, Shahrad Taheri, Abdul Basit, Anthony H Barnett.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disruption of endogenous circadian rhythms has been shown to increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, suggesting that circadian genes might play a role in determining disease susceptibility. We present the results of a pilot study investigating the association between type 2 diabetes and selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in/near nine circadian genes. The variants were chosen based on their previously reported association with prostate cancer, a disease that has been suggested to have a genetic link with type 2 diabetes through a number of shared inherited risk determinants. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22485135 PMCID: PMC3317653 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Odds ratios and p values for the association of circadian gene variants with type 2 diabetes.
| UKADS/DGP | SAT2D | DIAGRAM+ | ALL DATASETS | |||||||||
| Gene region | SNP | Allele (minor/common) | MAF | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | phet |
| PER3 | rs1012477 | C/G | 0.05 | 1.11 (0.89–1.39) | 0.345 | 0.95 (0.85–1.06) | 0.345 | 0.98 (0.93–1.04) | 0.510 | 0.98 (0.94–1.03) | 0.438 | 0.447 |
| BMAL1 | rs11022775 | T/C | 0.16 | 1.22 (1.07–1.39) |
| 0.98 (0.93–1.04) | 0.519 | 0.91 (0.83–0.99) |
| 0.99 (0.94–1.04) | 0.633 | 0.001 |
| CLOCK | rs11133373 | G/C | 0.38 | 0.93 (0.84–1.03) | 0.150 | 0.98 (0.92–1.04) | 0.449 | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.796 | 0.98 (0.95–1.01) | 0.267 | 0.476 |
| CRY1 | rs12315175 | C/T | 0.07 | 0.94 (0.78–1.12) | 0.471 | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.089 | 0.96 (0.91–1.01) | 0.085 | 0.95 (0.91–0.99) |
| 0.794 |
| NPAS2 | rs1369481 | T/C | 0.24 | 0.94 (0.84–1.05) | 0.264 | 1.10 (1.04–1.16) |
| 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.780 | 1.03 (0.99–1.06) | 0.102 | 0.003 |
| CSNK1E | rs1534891 | T/C | 0.19 | 1.03 (0.91–1.17) | 0.613 | 0.98 (0.92–1.03) | 0.389 | 1.00 (0.95–1.06) | 0.908 | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.728 | 0.639 |
| NPAS2 | rs17024926 | C/T | 0.32 | 1.06 (0.96–1.18) | 0.268 | 0.93 (0.89–0.98) |
| 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 0.595 | 0.99 (0.96–1.02) | 0.336 | 0.018 |
| PER1 | rs2289591 | A/C | 0.14 | 0.96 (0.83–1.11) | 0.582 | 1.00 (0.93–1.09) | 0.908 | 0.96 (0.92–1.01) | 0.101 | 0.97 (0.93–1.01) | 0.150 | 0.624 |
| CRY2 | rs2292912 | C/G | 0.27 | 1.02 (0.91–1.13) | 0.752 | 1.05 (1.00–1.12) | 0.057 | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) | 0.056 | 1.05 (1.01–1.08) |
| 0.846 |
| PER2 | rs7602358 | G/T | 0.16 | 0.75 (0.66–0.86) |
| 0.99 (0.93–1.06) | 0.832 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.269 | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.648 | 1.01×10−4 |
| BMAL1 | rs7950226 | A/G | 0.46 | 1.04 (0.95–1.15) | 0.406 | 1.02 (0.97–1.07) | 0.471 | 0.99 (0.92–1.07) | 0.785 | 1.01 (0.98–1.05) | 0.451 | 0.700 |
| PER1 | rs885747 | C/G | 0.29 | 0.96 (0.86–1.07) | 0.492 | 1.03 (0.96–1.10) | 0.456 | NA | NA | 1.01 (0.95–1.07) | 0.813 | 0.328 |
| NPAS2 | rs895521 | T/C | 0.15 | 0.91 (0.80–1.04) | 0.184 | 1.00 (0.94–1.08) | 0.875 | 0.97 (0.92–1.03) | 0.327 | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | 0.294 | 0.439 |
MAF – minor allele frequency in UKADS/DGP normoglycaemic control subjects, OR (95% CI) – allelic odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, p – significance level for disease association (p values less than 0.05 are shown in bold), phet – significance level of heterogeneity of odds ratios between datasets, NA – data not available, SNP failed QC in meta-analysis.
Figure 1Association of 13 circadian gene SNPs with type 2 diabetes.
Forest plot showing the association of 13 circadian gene SNPs with type 2 diabetes in South Asian (UKADS/DGP and SAT2D) and white European (DIAGRAM+) cohorts.