Ryan D Moore1, Cecile Gallea, Silvina G Horovitz, Mark Hallett. 1. Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Building 10, Room 7D37, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1428, Bethesda, MD 20892-1428, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To better understand deficient selective motor control in focal hand dystonia by determining changes in striatal activation and connectivity in patients performing individuated finger control. METHODS: Functional imaging with a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance scanner was performed on 18 patients and 17 controls during non-symptom producing tasks requiring right-handed individuated or coupled finger control. A global linear model and psychophysiologic interaction model compared individuated to coupled tasks for patients and controls separately, and the results were submitted to a group analysis. The sensorimotor (posterior) and associative (anterior) parts of the putamen were considered as seed regions for the connectivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients had significant differences in activations and connectivity during individuated compared to coupled tasks: (i) decreased activations in the bilateral postcentral gyri, right associative posterior parietal areas, right cerebellum and left posterior putamen, while activations in the left anterior putamen were not different; (ii) increased connectivity of the left posterior putamen with the left cerebellum and left sensorimotor cortex; and (iii) increased connectivity of the left anterior putamen with bilateral supplementary motor areas, the left premotor cortex, and left cerebellum. INTERPRETATION: Decreased activations in the sensorimotor putamen and cerebellum controlling the affected hand might underlie low levels of surround inhibition during individuated tasks. For identical motor performance in both groups, increased connectivity of sensorimotor and associative striato-cortical circuits in FHD suggests that both affected and unaffected territories of the striatum participate in compensatory processes. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES: To better understand deficient selective motor control in focal hand dystonia by determining changes in striatal activation and connectivity in patients performing individuated finger control. METHODS: Functional imaging with a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance scanner was performed on 18 patients and 17 controls during non-symptom producing tasks requiring right-handed individuated or coupled finger control. A global linear model and psychophysiologic interaction model compared individuated to coupled tasks for patients and controls separately, and the results were submitted to a group analysis. The sensorimotor (posterior) and associative (anterior) parts of the putamen were considered as seed regions for the connectivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients had significant differences in activations and connectivity during individuated compared to coupled tasks: (i) decreased activations in the bilateral postcentral gyri, right associative posterior parietal areas, right cerebellum and left posterior putamen, while activations in the left anterior putamen were not different; (ii) increased connectivity of the left posterior putamen with the left cerebellum and left sensorimotor cortex; and (iii) increased connectivity of the left anterior putamen with bilateral supplementary motor areas, the left premotor cortex, and left cerebellum. INTERPRETATION: Decreased activations in the sensorimotor putamen and cerebellum controlling the affected hand might underlie low levels of surround inhibition during individuated tasks. For identical motor performance in both groups, increased connectivity of sensorimotor and associative striato-cortical circuits in FHD suggests that both affected and unaffected territories of the striatum participate in compensatory processes. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Zafiris J Daskalakis; Guillermo O Paradiso; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Carolyn Gunraj; Robert Chen Journal: J Physiol Date: 2004-03-26 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Vikram G Shakkottai; Amit Batla; Kailash Bhatia; William T Dauer; Christian Dresel; Martin Niethammer; David Eidelberg; Robert S Raike; Yoland Smith; H A Jinnah; Ellen J Hess; Sabine Meunier; Mark Hallett; Rachel Fremont; Kamran Khodakhah; Mark S LeDoux; Traian Popa; Cécile Gallea; Stéphane Lehericy; Andreea C Bostan; Peter L Strick Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Zhihao Li; Cecília N Prudente; Randall Stilla; K Sathian; H A Jinnah; Xiaoping Hu Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Cathérine C S Delnooz; Jaco W Pasman; Christian F Beckmann; Bart P C van de Warrenburg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C Gallea; M Balas; E Bertasi; R Valabregue; D García-Lorenzo; D Coynel; C Bonnet; D Grabli; M Pélégrini-Issac; J Doyon; H Benali; E Roze; M Vidailhet; S Lehericy Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Kirsten E Zeuner; Arne Knutzen; Oliver Granert; Julia Götz; Stephan Wolff; Olav Jansen; Dirk Dressler; Harald Hefter; Mark Hallett; Günther Deuschl; Thilo van Eimeren; Karsten Witt Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 2.708