Literature DB >> 14645385

How self-initiated memorized movements become automatic: a functional MRI study.

Tao Wu1, Kenji Kansaku, Mark Hallett.   

Abstract

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dual tasks to investigate the physiology of how movements become automatic. Normal subjects were asked to practice some self-initiated, self-paced, memorized sequential finger movements with different complexity until they could perform the tasks automatically. Automaticity was evaluated by having subjects perform a secondary task simultaneously with the sequential movements. Our secondary task was a letter-counting task where subjects were asked to identify the number of times a target letter from the letter sequences was seen. Only the performances that achieved high accuracy in both single and dual tasks were considered automatic. The fMRI results before and after automaticity was achieved were compared. Our data showed that for both conditions, sequential movements activated similar brain regions. No additional activity was observed in the automatic condition. There was less activity in bilateral cerebellum, presupplementary motor area, cingulate cortex, left caudate nucleus, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, and prefrontal cortex during the automatic stage. These findings suggest that most of the motor network participates in executing automatic movements and that it becomes more efficient as movements become more automatic. Our results do not provide evidence for any area to become more activated for automatic movements.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645385     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01052.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  94 in total

1.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in stereopsis and hand-eye coordination during motor task behaviours.

Authors:  Giulia Paggetti; Daniel Richard Leff; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; George Mylonas; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Gloria Menegaz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 2.  What can studying musicians tell us about motor control of the hand?

Authors:  Alan H D Watson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Distinct neural systems underlie learning visuomotor and spatial representations of motor skills.

Authors:  Michael W Parsons; Deborah L Harrington; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Motor control abnormalities in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; Britne Shabbott; Juan Camilo Cortés
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  Physiology of psychogenic movement disorders.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 7.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  The influence of normal human ageing on automatic movements.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Stéphane Lehéricy; Habib Benali; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Tobias Waechter; Kamil Ugurbil; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Reduced functional activation after fatiguing exercise is not confined to primary motor areas.

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.