Literature DB >> 22483132

Educational value of morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences: are minor complications important?

Marie K Thomas1, Robert J McDonald, Eugene F Foley, Sharon M Weber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Often, minor complications are not reported in morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference because they are considered insignificant to patient outcome. As part of an effort to improve the quality of the M&M conference, we sought to integrate a specific, focused intervention to improve the reporting of minor complications and to evaluate the perception of its educational value.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To provide evidence-based training in recognizing, treating, and preventing minor complications, a presentation strategy was created. Surgical faculty identified 20 complications as minor complications. Each month, a junior resident was assigned to give a 10-minute presentation, assessing 1 of the 20 minor complications in depth during the M&M conference. To assess the impact of the intervention, we surveyed residents and faculty about the educational value of M&M conferences before and after implementation.
RESULTS: Before introducing minor complication presentations into the M&amp;M conference, only 58% of respondents indicated that minor complications should be reported at the conference. After the changes were implemented in minor complication reporting, 95% of respondents said that minor complications should be reported (p < 0.01). Eighty-nine percent of respondents found the minor complication presentations to be educationally beneficial. In addition, postsurvey respondents were also more likely than presurvey respondents to identify that a purpose of an M&amp;M conference was to improve patient care (29% vs 71%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A formal, evidence-based presentation of minor complications can increase both the faculty and residents' perception of the importance of reporting minor complications at an M&amp;M conference. Focused minor complication reporting should be incorporated into M&amp;M curriculum.
Copyright © 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22483132     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

1.  Implementation and evaluation of structured nephrology morbidity and mortality conferences: a quality education report.

Authors:  Pierre Antoine Brown; Swapnil Hiremath; Edward G Clark; Edmund S H Kwok; Christopher McCudden; Ayub Akbari
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Are morbidity and mortality conferences DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or can they be revived?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-09-28

Review 3.  Evolving from Morbidity and Mortality to a Case-based Error Reduction Conference: Evidence-based Best Practices from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors.

Authors:  Yashwant Chathampally; Benjamin Cooper; David B Wood; Gregory Tudor; Michael Gottlieb
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-06

4.  Morbidity and mortality conferences: Their educational role and why we should be there.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-11-26

Review 5.  At the Crossroad with Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Lessons Learned through a Narrative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xin Xiong; Teela Johnson; Dev Jayaraman; Emily G McDonald; Myriam Martel; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.