BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are almost always estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Most delayed breast cancer recurrences occur in ER-positive patients. Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been implicated in recurrence. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DTCs and CTCs are associated with ILCs in stage I-III breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical stage I-III breast cancer patients consented to participate in an institutional review board-approved study involving collection of bone marrow and blood at surgery for primary breast cancer. We assessed DTCs by anti-CK antibody cocktail after cytospin. We detected CTCs using CellSearch, and defined them as nucleated cells lacking CD45 but expressing cytokeratin. One or more cells per 5 mL bone marrow or 7.5 mL blood was considered positive. We performed statistical analyses using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 422 patients, 64 with ILC and 358 with invasive ductal carcinoma. Estrogen receptor positivity was higher in ILCs (92.2% versus 66.2%) {P = .001}. We identified DTCs to be 43.4% with ILC compared with 28.9% with IDC {P = 0.03}. The CTC rates were similar. Either DTCs or CTCs were identified in 75.6% with ILC, compared with 51.7% with invasive ductal carcinoma {P = .002}. We observed no correlation between the presence of DTCs and CTCs in ILC patients and tumor size, grade, hormone receptor status, stage, lymph node status, or administration of NACT. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive lobular carcinomas independently predicted micrometastatic disease. Because most late recurrences are ER positive, this raises the question of whether DTCs and CTCs are indeed responsible for late breast cancer recurrence. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are almost always estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Most delayed breast cancer recurrences occur in ER-positive patients. Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been implicated in recurrence. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DTCs and CTCs are associated with ILCs in stage I-III breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical stage I-III breast cancerpatients consented to participate in an institutional review board-approved study involving collection of bone marrow and blood at surgery for primary breast cancer. We assessed DTCs by anti-CK antibody cocktail after cytospin. We detected CTCs using CellSearch, and defined them as nucleated cells lacking CD45 but expressing cytokeratin. One or more cells per 5 mL bone marrow or 7.5 mL blood was considered positive. We performed statistical analyses using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 422 patients, 64 with ILC and 358 with invasive ductal carcinoma. Estrogen receptor positivity was higher in ILCs (92.2% versus 66.2%) {P = .001}. We identified DTCs to be 43.4% with ILC compared with 28.9% with IDC {P = 0.03}. The CTC rates were similar. Either DTCs or CTCs were identified in 75.6% with ILC, compared with 51.7% with invasive ductal carcinoma {P = .002}. We observed no correlation between the presence of DTCs and CTCs in ILC patients and tumor size, grade, hormone receptor status, stage, lymph node status, or administration of NACT. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive lobular carcinomas independently predicted micrometastatic disease. Because most late recurrences are ER positive, this raises the question of whether DTCs and CTCs are indeed responsible for late breast cancer recurrence. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Carolyn Hall; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Ashutosh Lodhi; Kailash Mosalpuria; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Anthony Lucci Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: V F Cocquyt; P N Blondeel; H T Depypere; M M Praet; V R Schelfhout; O E Silva; J Hurley; R F Serreyn; K K Daems; S J P Van Belle Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Maureen Trudeau; Harriet K Kahn; Rebecca Dent; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod; Wedad M Hanna Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F-C Bidard; C Mathiot; S Delaloge; E Brain; S Giachetti; P de Cremoux; M Marty; J-Y Pierga Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nina Ditsch; Barbara Mayer; Michaela Rolle; Michael Untch; Friedrich Wilhelm Schildberg; Ilona Funke Journal: Recent Results Cancer Res Date: 2003
Authors: Tanja Fehm; Natalia Krawczyk; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Graziella Becker-Pergola; Silke Dürr-Störzer; Hans Neubauer; Harald Seeger; Annette Staebler; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sven Becker Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Max A K Rätze; Thijs Koorman; Thijmen Sijnesael; Blessing Bassey-Archibong; Robert van de Ven; Lotte Enserink; Daan Visser; Sridevi Jaksani; Ignacio Viciano; Elvira R M Bakker; François Richard; Andrew Tutt; Lynda O'Leary; Amanda Fitzpatrick; Pere Roca-Cusachs; Paul J van Diest; Christine Desmedt; Juliet M Daniel; Clare M Isacke; Patrick W B Derksen Journal: Oncogene Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 8.756
Authors: Tian Du; Li Zhu; Kevin M Levine; Nilgun Tasdemir; Adrian V Lee; Dario A A Vignali; Bennett Van Houten; George C Tseng; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: D J E Peeters; P-J van Dam; G G M Van den Eynden; A Rutten; H Wuyts; L Pouillon; M Peeters; P Pauwels; S J Van Laere; P A van Dam; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 7.640