Literature DB >> 22482642

A novel methodology for 3D deformable dosimetry.

U J Yeo1, M L Taylor, L Dunn, T Kron, R L Smith, R D Franich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interfraction and intrafraction variation in anatomic structures is a significant challenge in contemporary radiotherapy. The objective of this work is to develop a novel tool for deformable structure dosimetry, using a tissue-equivalent deformable gel dosimeter that can reproducibly simulate targets subject to deformation. This will enable direct measurement of integrated doses delivered in different deformation states, and the verification of dose deforming algorithms.
METHODS: A modified version of the nPAG polymer gel has been used as a deformable 3D dosimeter and phantom to investigate doses delivered to deforming tissue-equivalent geometry. The deformable gel (DEFGEL) dosimeter/phantom is comprised of polymer gel in a latex membrane, moulded (in this case) into a cylindrical geometry, and deformed with an acrylic compressor. Fifteen aluminium fiducial markers (FM) were implanted into DEFGEL phantoms and the reproducibility of deformation was determined via multiple computed tomography (CT) scans in deformed and nondeformed states before and after multiple (up to 150) deformations. Dose was delivered to the DEFGEL phantom in three arrangements: (i) without deformation, (ii) with deformation, and (iii) cumulative exposures with and without deformation, i.e., dose integration. Irradiations included both square field and a stereotactic multiple dynamic arc treatment adapted from a patient plan. Doses delivered to the DEFGEL phantom were read out using cone beam optical CT.
RESULTS: Reproducibility was verified by observation of interscan shifts of FM locations (as determined via CT), measured from an absolute reference point and in terms of inter-FM distance. The majority (76%) of points exhibited zero shift, with others shifting by one pixel size consistent with setup error as confirmed with a control sample. Comparison of dose profiles and 2D isodose distributions from the three arrangements illustrated complex spatial redistribution of dose in all three dimensions occurring as a result of the change in shape of the target between irradiations, even for a relatively simple deformation. Discrepancies of up to 30% of the maximum dose were evident from dose difference maps for three orthogonal planes taken through the isocenter of a stereotactic field.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes the first use of a tissue-equivalent, 3D dose-integrating deformable phantom that yields integrated or redistributed dosimetric information. The proposed methodology readily yields three-dimensional (3D) dosimetric data from radiation delivery to the DEFGEL phantom in deformed and undeformed states. The impacts of deformation on dose distributions were readily seen in the isodose contours and line profiles from the three arrangements. It is demonstrated that the system is potentially capable of reproducibly emulating the physical deformation of an organ, and therefore can be used to evaluate absorbed doses to deformable targets and organs at risk in three dimensions and to validate deformation algorithms applied to dose distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482642     DOI: 10.1118/1.3694107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  A mass-conserving 4D XCAT phantom for dose calculation and accumulation.

Authors:  Christopher L Williams; Pankaj Mishra; Joao Seco; Sara St James; Raymond H Mak; Ross I Berbeco; John H Lewis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Utility and validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in low-contrast images.

Authors:  Michael Velec; Titania Juang; Joanne L Moseley; Mark Oldham; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-03-29

3.  Initial characterization of a gel patch dosimeter for in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  C Matrosic; W Culberson; B Rosen; E Madsen; G Frank; B Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  On the need for comprehensive validation of deformable image registration, investigated with a novel 3-dimensional deformable dosimeter.

Authors:  Titania Juang; Shiva Das; John Adamovics; Ron Benning; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Toward the development of intrafraction tumor deformation tracking using a dynamic multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ge; Ricky T O'Brien; Chun-Chien Shieh; Jeremy T Booth; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom.

Authors:  Charles K Matrosic; Wesley Culberson; Andrew Shepard; Sydney Jupitz; Bryan Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Preliminary investigation and application of a novel deformable PRESAGE® dosimeter.

Authors:  T Juang; J Newton; S Das; J Adamovics; M Oldham
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2013

8.  Computed tomography-guided implantation of 125I seeds brachytherapy for recurrent multiple pulmonary oligometastases: initial experience and results.

Authors:  Jie Li; Lijuan Zhang; Wenhuan Xu; Teng Wang; Leyuan Zhou; Qigen Xie; Weiguo Wang; Yanyan Hua
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-04-03

9.  Assessment of anatomical and dosimetric changes by a deformable registration method during the course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Yidong Ma; Jinhu Chen; Liming Wang; Guifang Zhang; Mukun Zhao; Yong Yin
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Evaluation of dosimetric misrepresentations from 3D conventional planning of liver SBRT using 4D deformable dose integration.

Authors:  Unjin A Yeo; Michael L Taylor; Jeremy R Supple; Shankar Siva; Tomas Kron; Daniel Pham; Rick D Franich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.