Literature DB >> 22482034

Quantifying the advantage of looking forward.

Tobias Preis, Helen Susannah Moat, H Eugene Stanley, Steven R Bishop.   

Abstract

We introduce a future orientation index to quantify the degree to which Internet users worldwide seek more information about years in the future than years in the past. We analyse Google logs and find a striking correlation between the country's GDP and the predisposition of its inhabitants to look forward.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482034      PMCID: PMC3320057          DOI: 10.1038/srep00350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Recent years have witnessed a revolution in the social sciences. Mammoth amounts of data are now being generated through society's extensive interactions with technological systems, automatically documenting collective human behaviour in a previously unimaginable fashion123. Analysis of such “big data” opens up new opportunities for a more precise and extensive quantification of real world social phenomena that was difficult to attain using complicated and expensive surveys and laboratory experiments alone. A particularly fruitful area of research has focused on the analysis of Internet user search queries, as logged by search engines such as Google. Strong links have been found between changes in the information users are seeking online and events in the real world, ranging from reports of flu infections across the USA4 to the trading volume in the US stock markets5. Interdependencies among social entities distributed worldwide are growing, a development with repercussions for the way our world works6. However, research based on search engine queries has to date offered insight into behaviour only within distinct linguistic silos, due to its reliance on keyword analysis, and the thousands of different languages spoken in our linguistically varied world.

Results

In this study, we present a cross-country analysis of search engine queries, and demonstrate a strong link between behaviour online and real world economic indicators. By considering searches for years represented in Arabic numerals, an almost ubiquitous written representation, we can evaluate worldwide interest in years in the future (such as “2013”) and years in the past (such as “2011”). These representations have previously been considered in an investigation of a large corpus of text from books, where analysis suggested that authors' interest in the past has decreased over time7. Here, we compare the predisposition of Internet users in different countries to look more to the future, or more to the past. We find that the online “future orientation” of a country is strongly correlated with the country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP). For these reasons, we calculate the ratio of the volume of searches made for the coming year (represented in Arabic numerals) to the volume of searches for the previous year and call this value the future orientation index (Fig. 1a). We compute the future orientation index for each of 45 countries with data from the search engine Google for users located in the country in question from the year 2010, using the search terms “2009” and “2011”. The Google Trends service from which these data are taken does not report absolute search volumes, but scales these volumes according to the average search volume for the first term in each data request. For each country, we therefore request the search volumes for all terms simultaneously, to ensure that these volumes are comparable. We compare the future orientation index to the country's per capita GDP, calculated on a purchasing power parity basis, which we retrieve from the CIA World Factbook which provides figures as of 1 July 2010. Our analysis considers countries for which both Google Trends and the CIA World Factbook provide data, and to reduce noise excludes countries with fewer than five million Internet users, for which few search data are available. We uncover a strong tendency for countries in which Google users enquire more about the future to exhibit a larger per capita GDP (Fig. 1b; Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.78, df = 43, p < 0.001). We investigate the robustness of the future orientation index by considering search data from earlier years. The ratio calculation that this index is based on allows it to absorb any overall increase or decrease in the volume of searches from year to year. We find similar relationships between the future orientation index and per capita GDP in 2010 for calculations of the index with search data from 2009, using the search terms “2008” and “2010” (r = 0.64, df = 43, p < 0.001), and for calculations of the index with search data from 2008, using the search terms “2007” and “2009” (r = 0.53, df = 43, p < 0.001).
Figure 1

The future orientation index, and its correlation with per capita GDP.

(a) The frequency with which Google users worldwide search for information about the previous year (in red) and the following year (in blue). Data are plotted for each of 52 weeks per year. The future orientation index for a given year (e.g., 2010) is calculated as the ratio of the total number of searches for the following year (“2011”) to the total number of searches for the previous year (“2009”). (b) The future orientation index for 45 countries based on searches in 2010, compared with per capita GDP. We demonstrate a strong tendency for countries in which Google users enquire more about the future to possess a larger per capita GDP (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.78, df = 43, p < 0.001).

Discussion

In this study, we have introduced the future orientation index, which quantifies to what extent Internet users worldwide are seeking information about the future rather than the past. The analysis described here shows that the value of this index for 45 countries in 2010 is correlated with a key economic indicator, per capita GDP. Our results are consistent with the intriguing possibility that there is a relationship between the economic success of a country and the information seeking behaviour of its citizens online. We highlight two potential explanations for such a relationship. Firstly, these findings may reflect international differences in attention to the future and the past, where a focus on the future supports economic success. Secondly, these findings may reflect international differences in the type of information sought online, perhaps due to economic influences on available Internet infrastructure. We suggest that the future orientation index may be productively applied to further spatial and temporal divisions, and compared with further social and economic indicators, to help develop an Internet data driven image of worldwide society today.

Author Contributions

T.P., H.S.M., H.E.S. and S.R.B. performed analyses, discussed the results, and contributed to the text of the manuscript.
  7 in total

1.  Complex dynamics of our economic life on different scales: insights from search engine query data.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Daniel Reith; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems.

Authors:  Alessandro Vespignani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Economic networks: the new challenges.

Authors:  Frank Schweitzer; Giorgio Fagiolo; Didier Sornette; Fernando Vega-Redondo; Alessandro Vespignani; Douglas R White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences.

Authors:  Gary King
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Michel; Yuan Kui Shen; Aviva Presser Aiden; Adrian Veres; Matthew K Gray; Joseph P Pickett; Dale Hoiberg; Dan Clancy; Peter Norvig; Jon Orwant; Steven Pinker; Martin A Nowak; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.

Authors:  Jeremy Ginsberg; Matthew H Mohebbi; Rajan S Patel; Lynnette Brammer; Mark S Smolinski; Larry Brilliant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Social science. Computational social science.

Authors:  David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  50 in total

1.  Linking agent-based models and stochastic models of financial markets.

Authors:  Ling Feng; Baowen Li; Boris Podobnik; Tobias Preis; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Future-oriented tweets predict lower county-level HIV prevalence in the United States.

Authors:  Molly E Ireland; H Andrew Schwartz; Qijia Chen; Lyle H Ungar; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves.

Authors:  Chester Curme; Tobias Preis; H Eugene Stanley; Helen Susannah Moat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Impact of heterogeneity and socioeconomic factors on individual behavior in decentralized sharing ecosystems.

Authors:  Arnau Gavaldà-Miralles; David R Choffnes; John S Otto; Mario A Sánchez; Fabián E Bustamante; Luís A N Amaral; Jordi Duch; Roger Guimerà
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Risks and Opportunities to Ensure Equity in the Application of Big Data Research in Public Health.

Authors:  Paul Wesson; Yulin Hswen; Gilmer Valdes; Kristefer Stojanovski; Margaret A Handley
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  The competitiveness versus the wealth of a country.

Authors:  Boris Podobnik; Davor Horvatić; Dror Y Kenett; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Quantifying the behavior of stock correlations under market stress.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Dror Y Kenett; H Eugene Stanley; Dirk Helbing; Eshel Ben-Jacob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Global Search Trends of Oral Problems using Google Trends from 2004 to 2016: An Exploratory Analysis.

Authors:  Basavaraj Patthi; Jishnu Krishna Kumar; Ashish Singla; Ritu Gupta; Monika Prasad; Irfan Ali; Kuldeep Dhama; Lav Kumar Niraj
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.

Authors:  Stefano Casalegno; Richard Inger; Caitlin Desilvey; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Helen Susannah Moat; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.