Literature DB >> 22481596

Study of PET intrinsic spatial resolution and contrast recovery improvement for PET/MRI systems.

Hao Peng1, Craig S Levin.   

Abstract

This paper studied PET intrinsic spatial resolution and contrast recovery improvement for PET/MRI dual modality systems. A Monte Carlo simulation tool was developed to study positron diffusion in tissues with and without a magnetic field for six commonly used isotopes ((18)F, (11)C, (13)N, (15)O, (68)Ga and (82)Rb). A convolution process was implemented to investigate PET intrinsic spatial resolution, taking into account three factors: positron diffusion range, collinear photon annihilation and finite detector element width. The resolution improvement was studied quantitatively as a function of magnetic field strength for three PET system configurations (whole-body, brain-dedicated and small-animal PET). When the magnetic field strength increases up to 10 T, the system spatial resolution in directions orthogonal to the field for (15)O, (68)Ga and (82)Rb is comparable to that of (18)F without the magnetic field. Beyond 10 T, no significant improvement of spatial resolution was observed. In addition, the modulation transfer function was studied to predict the intrinsic contrast recovery improvement for several existing and promising PET/MRI configurations.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22481596     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/9/N101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Simulation of positron emitters for monitoring of dose distribution in proton therapy.

Authors:  Mohsen Mashayekhi; Ali Asghar Mowlavi; Sayyed Bijan Jia
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-10-31

2.  The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides.

Authors:  L M Carter; Adam Leon Kesner; E C Pratt; V A Sanders; A V F Massicano; C S Cutler; S E Lapi; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Monte Carlo Simulations of the GE Signa PET/MR for Different Radioisotopes.

Authors:  Paulo R R V Caribé; Stefaan Vandenberghe; André Diogo; David Pérez-Benito; Nikos Efthimiou; Charlotte Thyssen; Yves D'Asseler; Michel Koole
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Effects of magnetic fields of up to 9.4 T on resolution and contrast of PET images as measured with an MR-BrainPET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Hans Herzog; Christoph Weirich; Lutz Tellmann; Joachim Kaffanke; Liliana Caldeira; Elena Rota Kops; Syed M Qaim; Heinz H Coenen; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does the novel integrated PET/MRI offer the same diagnostic performance as PET/CT for oncological indications?

Authors:  Jiahe Tian; Liping Fu; Dayi Yin; Jinming Zhang; Yingmao Chen; Ningyu An; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluations of the performances of PET and MRI in a simultaneous PET/MRI instrument for pre-clinical imaging.

Authors:  Alyssa C Pollard; Jorge de la Cerda; F William Schuler; Charles V Kingsley; Seth T Gammon; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-10-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.