OBJECTIVE: To compare the factor structure of 6 short forms of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) by means of confirmatory factor analysis in patients after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: University-based surgical clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=137) treated by spinal surgery for a degenerative condition (ie, spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and spondylolisthesis). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients completed the TSK within 3 months of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 2-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 had a reasonable fit for the data, with internal consistency values >.70. A 1-factor TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) demonstrated an excellent fit for the data, but an adequate internal consistency was not maintained. A poor fit was noted for the 1-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11, and a 4-item TSK (items 1, 2, 9, and 11). CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides further evidence that specific short-form versions of the TSK may be useful for assessing fear of movement in surgical populations. Results support the measurement of fear of movement using the 2-factor, 13- and 11-item versions of the TSK in patients after spinal surgery. A TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) offers a promising alternative to the TSK-13 and TSK-11. However, further research is needed to test the validity and reliability of the TSK-4 in patients undergoing spinal surgery in order to support its use in a clinical environment. Researchers and clinicians interested in a shorter measure of fear of movement should consider using the TSK-11.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the factor structure of 6 short forms of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) by means of confirmatory factor analysis in patients after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: University-based surgical clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=137) treated by spinal surgery for a degenerative condition (ie, spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and spondylolisthesis). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients completed the TSK within 3 months of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 2-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 had a reasonable fit for the data, with internal consistency values >.70. A 1-factor TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) demonstrated an excellent fit for the data, but an adequate internal consistency was not maintained. A poor fit was noted for the 1-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11, and a 4-item TSK (items 1, 2, 9, and 11). CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides further evidence that specific short-form versions of the TSK may be useful for assessing fear of movement in surgical populations. Results support the measurement of fear of movement using the 2-factor, 13- and 11-item versions of the TSK in patients after spinal surgery. A TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) offers a promising alternative to the TSK-13 and TSK-11. However, further research is needed to test the validity and reliability of the TSK-4 in patients undergoing spinal surgery in order to support its use in a clinical environment. Researchers and clinicians interested in a shorter measure of fear of movement should consider using the TSK-11.
Authors: Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Dawn M Ehde; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Clinton J Devin; Stephen T Wegener; Kristin R Archer Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-09-28
Authors: James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Manasi S Parrish; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Dustin H Massel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Jennifer Westrick; Rebecca Van Horn; Kern Singh Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Jordan A Bley; Laura J Huston; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Hiral Master; Emily K Reinke; Mackenzie L Bird; Erica A Scaramuzza; Christine M Haug; Shannon L Mathis; Susan W Vanston; Charles L Cox; Kurt P Spindler; Kristin R Archer Journal: Phys Ther Sport Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 2.920