Literature DB >> 31965855

Using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Short Form in Patients With Upper Extremity Specific Limitations.

Joost T P Kortlever1, Prithvi Karyampudi1, Janna S E Ottenhoff1, David Ring1, Gregg A Vagner1, Lee M Reichel1.   

Abstract

Background: The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is used to quantify fear of painful movement. A shorter form with only 4 questions (TSK-4) can be used by physicians to look for fear of movement independent of catastrophic thinking with less responder and survey burden. We assessed the difference explained in amount of variation in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity (PROMIS PF UE) between the TSK and TSK-4. Additionally, we looked for other factors that were associated with the PROMIS PF UE, and we assessed reliability and validity of the TSK and TSK-4 by looking at mean scaled scores, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, interquestionnaire correlations, and collinearity with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale short form (PCS-4), PROMIS Depression, and PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS PI).
Methods: One hundred forty eight new and follow-up patients were seen at 5 orthopedic clinics in a large urban area and given the TSK, PROMIS PF UE, PROMIS Depression, PROMIS PI, and PCS-4 questionnaires.
Results: Both long and short measures of greater fear of painful movement were independently associated with less physical function (PROMIS PF UE). The longer version accounted for more of the variation in physical function than the short version (TSK, semipartial R2 = 0.12, adjusted R2 full model 0.25; TSK-4, semipartial R2 = 0.03, adjusted R2 full model = 0.16, respectively). The shorter measure had slight floor and ceiling effects. There was high internal consistency for both the TSK and TSK-4. Conclusions: A short measure of fear of painful movement may be an adequate screen in the care of patients with upper extremity problems. Using this short form can help decrease questionnaire burden while accounting for kinesiophobia along with catastrophic thinking.Level of Evidence: Prognostic, level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinesiophobia; TSK-4; fear of movement; physical function; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31965855      PMCID: PMC8647314          DOI: 10.1177/1558944719898830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  20 in total

1.  Fear of movement: factor structure of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Tasha Burwinkle; James P Robinson; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain.

Authors:  E J C M Swinkels-Meewisse; R A H M Swinkels; A L M Verbeek; J W S Vlaeyen; R A B Oostendorp
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2003-02

4.  Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference.

Authors:  Dagmar Amtmann; Karon F Cook; Mark P Jensen; Wen-Hung Chen; Seung Choi; Dennis Revicki; David Cella; Nan Rothrock; Francis Keefe; Leigh Callahan; Jin-Shei Lai
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Comparative study of short forms of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: fear of movement in a surgical spine population.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Kevin D Phelps; Caryn L Seebach; Yanna Song; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account.

Authors:  Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Idiopathic arm pain.

Authors:  David Ring; Daniel Guss; Leah Malhotra; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Psychological differences between patients that elect operative or nonoperative treatment for trapeziometacarpal joint arthrosis.

Authors:  Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; J Sebastiaan Souer; Jesse B Jupiter; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2008-03-29

9.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Kinesiophobia After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Zhengzhou, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Libai Cai; Yanjin Liu; Huiping Xu; Qiulu Xu; Yanyan Wang; Peihua Lyu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank Reduces Test Burden With Less Ceiling Effects Compared With the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Man Hung; Ami R Stuart; Thomas F Higgins; Charles L Saltzman; Erik N Kubiak
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Do Unhelpful Thoughts or Confidence in Problem Solving Have Stronger Associations with Musculoskeletal Illness?

Authors:  Ayane Rossano; Aresh Al Salman; David Ring; J Mica Guzman; Amirreza Fatehi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.