| Literature DB >> 22479402 |
Ervin Sejdić1, Catriona M Steele, Tom Chau.
Abstract
Head movements can greatly affect swallowing accelerometry signals. In this paper, we implement a spline-based approach to remove low frequency components associated with these motions. Our approach was tested using both synthetic and real data. Synthetic signals were used to perform a comparative analysis of the spline-based approach with other similar techniques. Real data, obtained data from 408 healthy participants during various swallowing tasks, was used to analyze the processing accuracy with and without the spline-based head motions removal scheme. Specifically, we analyzed the segmentation accuracy and the effects of the scheme on statistical properties of these signals, as measured by the scaling analysis. The results of the numerical analysis showed that the spline-based technique achieves a superior performance in comparison to other existing techniques. Additionally, when applied to real data, we improved the accuracy of the segmentation process by achieving a 27% drop in the number of false negatives and a 30% drop in the number of false positives. Furthermore, the anthropometric trends in the statistical properties of these signals remained unaltered as shown by the scaling analysis, but the strength of statistical persistence was significantly reduced. These results clearly indicate that any future medical devices based on swallowing accelerometry signals should remove head motions from these signals in order to increase segmentation accuracy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22479402 PMCID: PMC3315562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1A dual-axis accelerometer attached to the participant's neck.
Values of in both directions providing the smallest MSE.
| 0 db | 5 dB | 10 dB | 15 dB | 20 dB | 25 dB | 30 dB | |
| A-P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| S-I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2A comparison of accuracies for the proposed method (solid line), SPM (dashed line), PPF (dash-dotted line) and EMD (dotted line).
(a) and (b) represent NMSE in the A-P and S-I directions, respectively, while generating new versions of , and with each new realization of eqn. (23). (c) and (d) represent NMSE in the A-P and S-I directions, respectively, while keeping constant and obtaining a new version of for each new realization of eqn. (23).
Segmentation accuracy before and after removing low-frequency components.
| Before removal | After removal | ||||||
| Swallowing type | TNS | CSS | NFP | NFN | CSS | NFP | NFN |
| Dry swallows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wet swallows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wet chin tuck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNS = total number of swallows; CSS = correctly segmented swallows; NFP = number of false positives; NFN = number of false negatives.
Comparison of the scaling exponent, , before and after low-frequency components.
| Before removal | After removal | |||
| Swallowing type | A-P | S-I | A-P | S-I |
| Dry swallows |
|
|
|
|
| Wet swallows |
|
|
|
|
| Wet chin tuck |
|
|
|
|