| Literature DB >> 22479330 |
Salem Hannoun1, Matthieu Bagory, Francoise Durand-Dubief, Danielle Ibarrola, Jean-Christophe Comte, Christian Confavreux, Francois Cotton, Dominique Sappey-Marinier.
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) provide greater sensitivity than conventional MRI to detect diffuse alterations in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients with different clinical forms. Therefore, the goal of this study is to combine DTI and MRSI measurements to analyze the relation between diffusion and metabolic markers, T2-weighted lesion load (T2-LL) and the patients clinical status. The sensitivity and specificity of both methods were then compared in terms of MS clinical forms differentiation. MR examination was performed on 71 MS patients (27 relapsing remitting (RR), 26 secondary progressive (SP) and 18 primary progressive (PP)) and 24 control subjects. DTI and MRSI measurements were obtained from two identical regions of interest selected in left and right centrum semioval (CSO) WM. DTI metrics and metabolic contents were significantly altered in MS patients with the exception of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) and NAA/Choline (Cho) ratio in RR patients. Significant correlations were observed between diffusion and metabolic measures to various degrees in every MS patients group. Most DTI metrics were significantly correlated with the T2-LL while only NAA/Cr ratio was correlated in RR patients. A comparison analysis of MR methods efficiency demonstrated a better sensitivity/specificity of DTI over MRSI. Nevertheless, NAA/Cr ratio could distinguish all MS and SP patients groups from controls, while NAA/Cho ratio differentiated PP patients from controls. This study demonstrated that diffusivity changes related to microstructural alterations were correlated with metabolic changes and provided a better sensitivity to detect early changes, particularly in RR patients who are more subject to inflammatory processes. In contrast, the better specificity of metabolic ratios to detect axonal damage and demyelination may provide a better index for identification of PP patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22479330 PMCID: PMC3316537 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics and group characteristics.
| Controls | RR | SP | PP | All-MS | |
|
| 24 | 27 | 26 | 18 | 71 |
|
| 36.0 (9.5) | 35.1 (7.3) | 41.7 (5.1) | 41.2 (6.5) | 39.1 (7.0) |
|
| - | 6.9 (4.2) | 14.3 (6.1) | 6.7 (3.1) | 9.5 (6.0) |
|
| - | 2 (0.0–6.0) | 4.8 (2.5–7.0) | 4.0 (2.5–7.0) | 4.0 (0.0–7.0) |
|
| - | 19.7 (11.3) | 28.9 (15.2) | 39.0 (20.6) | 28.0 (17.1) |
|
| - | 0.14(0.09) | 0.29(0.24) | 0.61(0.33) | 0.60(0.41) |
Values are expressed as mean (Standard deviation).
RR: relapsing remitting; SP: secondary progressive; PP: primary progressive; EDSS: expanded disability status scale; ROI T2-LL: T2-lesion load corresponding to the lesion volume measured within the region of interest (ROI); Brain T2-LL: T2-lesion load corresponding to the lesion volume measured in the whole brain.
Diffusion and metabolic measures in MS patients and control subjects groups.
| Controls | RR | SP | PP | All-MS | |
|
| 0.71±0.03 | 0.79±0.05*** | 0.86±0.10*** | 0.83±0.09*** | 0.83±0.09*** |
|
| 0.40±0.02 | 0.38±0.03* | 0.35±0.03*** | 0.36±0.04*** | 0.36±0.04*** |
|
| 1.03±0.04 | 1.12±0.05*** | 1.18±0.10*** | 1.16±0.10*** | 1.15±0.09*** |
|
| 0.55±0.03 | 0.63±0.05*** | 0.70±0.10*** | 0.67±0.09*** | 0.67±0.09*** |
|
| 11.52±1.01 | 11.12±0.76 | 10.19±1.29*** | 10.20±1.25*** | 10.54±1.18*** |
|
| 1.52±0.17 | 1.61±0.17 | 1.66±0.35 | 1.66±0.20 | 1.64±0.25* |
|
| 9.26±0.90 | 9.60±0.80 | 9.89±0.93* | 9.67±0.84 | 9.72±0.85* |
|
| 2.54±0.15 | 2.37±0.18** | 2.10±0.25*** | 2.15±0.18*** | 2.22±0.24*** |
|
| 2.72±0.28 | 2.49±0.31 | 2.28±0.50*** | 2.21±0.30*** | 2.34±0.40*** |
Values (Mean ± SD) of mean diffusion (MD), fraction of anisotropy (FA), axial (λa) and radial (λr) diffusivities, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho) and creatine (Cr) (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 when compared to controls). RR: relapsing remitting; SP: secondary progressive; PP: primary progressive.
Correlation rates (r) between diffusion and metabolic measures corrected for T2-lesion load in different groups of MS patients.
| NAA/Cr | NAA | |||||||
| RR | SP | PP | All-MS | RR | SP | PP | All-MS | |
|
| −0.60*** | −0.53** | −0.56* | −0.61*** | −0.37 | −0.53** | −0.57* | −0.57*** |
|
| 0.54** | 0.64*** | 0.46 | 0.58*** | 0.29 | 0.50** | 0.67** | 0.56*** |
|
| −0.52** | −0.47* | −0.55* | −0.57*** | −0.39* | −0.50** | −0.41 | −0.51*** |
|
| −0.60*** | −0.55** | −0.54* | −0.61*** | −0.35 | −0.54** | −0.63** | −0.59*** |
Correlation coefficient (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001).
MD: Mean diffusion, FA: fraction of anisotropy, λa: axial diffusivity, λr: radial diffusivity, NAA: N-acetylaspartate, Cr: creatine, RR: relapsing remitting; SP: secondary progressive; PP: primary progressive.
Correlation rates (r) between diffusion and metabolic measures and the ROI T2-LL in different groups of MS patients.
| ROI T2-LL | ||||
| RR | SP | PP | All-MS | |
|
| 0.62*** | 0.42* | 0.71*** | 0.58*** |
|
| 0.56** | 0.50** | 0.72*** | 0.61*** |
|
| 0.52** | 0.39* | 0.68** | 0.54*** |
|
| −0.40* | −0.08 | −0.33 | −0.37** |
Correlation significance (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001).
ROI T2-LL: T2-lesion load corresponding to the lesion volume within the region of interest, MD: mean diffusion, FA: fraction of anisotropy, λa: axial diffusivity, λr: radial diffusivity, NAA: N-acetylaspartate, Cr: creatine, RR: relapsing remitting; SP: secondary progressive; PP: primary progressive.
Figure 1Correlations between radial diffusivity (λr) and NAA/Cr ratio with the ROI T2-LL in RR, PP and all-MS patient groups. (NS = Not significant).
Figure 2ROC curves of the mean diffusion (MD), axial (λa) and radial (λr) diffusivities, NAA/Cho and NAA/Cr ratios in RR (A), SP (B), PP (C) and all-MS patient groups (D).
Areas under ROC curves analysis of DTI and MRSI derived measures in different groups of MS patients.
| RR | SP | PP | All-MS | |
|
| 0.98>0.78** | 0.96≈0.96 | 0.92≈0.96 | 0.96≈0.89 |
|
| 0.98>0.72*** | 0.96>0.78* | 0.92≈0.89 | 0.96>0.79** |
|
| 0.95>0.78* | 0.96≈0.96 | 0.93≈0.96 | 0.95≈0.89 |
|
| 0.95>0.72** | 0.96>0.78* | 0.93≈0.89 | 0.95>0.79** |
Statistical significance (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001) when comparing areas under ROC curves (AUC) of the following MR metrics: MD: mean diffusivity, λr: radial diffusivity, NAA: N-acetylaspartate, Cr: creatine, RR: relapsing remitting; SP: secondary progressive; PP: primary progressive.