BACKGROUND: Optimal dose adjustment of milrinone in critically ill children is challenging because of conflicting information about the association between dose and outcomes in this age group. OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of milrinone in critically ill children and to explore associations between milrinone dosing and clinical outcomes, specifically effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive sample of children admitted to a university-affiliated critical care unit (January to June 2004). The relations between milrinone dosing and its effectiveness (based on prevention of low cardiac output syndrome, defined as a difference in oxygen saturation between arterial and mixed venous blood of at least 30% or an increase in serum lactate > 2 mmol/L) and its adverse effects (thrombocytopenia, arrhythmia) were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 197 children from 213 admissions (ranging in age from newborn to 18 years) were included in the study. Milrinone was initiated with a median loading dose of 99.2 μg/kg (range 22.1-162.2 μg/kg). The initial loading dose was higher if given in the operating room rather than the Critical Care Unit (median 99.7 versus 51.0 μg/kg; p < 0.001). Subsequent loading doses, for patients who received them, were lower (median 49 μg/kg). Milrinone was infused at a median rate of 0.64 μg/kg per minute (range 0.13-2.08 μg/kg per minute) for a median of 43.1 h. There was no relation between serum creatinine level and the maintenance dose of milrinone (r2 ≤ 0.0335). Low cardiac output syndrome was relatively frequent (166 [77.9%] of the 213 admissions). There was a trend for occurrence of this syndrome in patients with greater average milrinone dose rate (odds ratio [OR] 8.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-69.15, p = 0.053) and with longer duration of milrinone therapy (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.05). Adverse events were relatively frequent (thrombocytopenia for 27 admissions [12.7%], arrhythmia for 82 admissions [38.5%]) but were not significantly associated with milrinone dosing. CONCLUSIONS: A retrospective evaluation of milrinone use in critically ill children revealed variable utilization and frequent occurrence of both low cardiac output syndrome and adverse events. Further prospective research is needed to understand the impact of individual pharmacokinetic differences on pharmacodynamic responses, to guide optimal dose adjustment, improve outcomes, and minimize toxic effects.
BACKGROUND: Optimal dose adjustment of milrinone in critically ill children is challenging because of conflicting information about the association between dose and outcomes in this age group. OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of milrinone in critically ill children and to explore associations between milrinone dosing and clinical outcomes, specifically effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive sample of children admitted to a university-affiliated critical care unit (January to June 2004). The relations between milrinone dosing and its effectiveness (based on prevention of low cardiac output syndrome, defined as a difference in oxygen saturation between arterial and mixed venous blood of at least 30% or an increase in serum lactate > 2 mmol/L) and its adverse effects (thrombocytopenia, arrhythmia) were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 197 children from 213 admissions (ranging in age from newborn to 18 years) were included in the study. Milrinone was initiated with a median loading dose of 99.2 μg/kg (range 22.1-162.2 μg/kg). The initial loading dose was higher if given in the operating room rather than the Critical Care Unit (median 99.7 versus 51.0 μg/kg; p < 0.001). Subsequent loading doses, for patients who received them, were lower (median 49 μg/kg). Milrinone was infused at a median rate of 0.64 μg/kg per minute (range 0.13-2.08 μg/kg per minute) for a median of 43.1 h. There was no relation between serum creatinine level and the maintenance dose of milrinone (r2 ≤ 0.0335). Low cardiac output syndrome was relatively frequent (166 [77.9%] of the 213 admissions). There was a trend for occurrence of this syndrome in patients with greater average milrinone dose rate (odds ratio [OR] 8.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-69.15, p = 0.053) and with longer duration of milrinone therapy (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.05). Adverse events were relatively frequent (thrombocytopenia for 27 admissions [12.7%], arrhythmia for 82 admissions [38.5%]) but were not significantly associated with milrinone dosing. CONCLUSIONS: A retrospective evaluation of milrinone use in critically ill children revealed variable utilization and frequent occurrence of both low cardiac output syndrome and adverse events. Further prospective research is needed to understand the impact of individual pharmacokinetic differences on pharmacodynamic responses, to guide optimal dose adjustment, improve outcomes, and minimize toxic effects.
Authors: Mary Paradisis; Xuemin Jiang; Andrew J McLachlan; Nick Evans; Martin Kluckow; David Osborn Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Stéphane Leteurtre; Alain Martinot; Alain Duhamel; François Proulx; Bruno Grandbastien; Jacques Cotting; Ronald Gottesman; Ari Joffe; Jurg Pfenninger; Philippe Hubert; Jacques Lacroix; Francis Leclerc Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James M Bailey; Timothy M Hoffman; David L Wessel; David P Nelson; Andrew M Atz; Anthony C Chang; Thomas J Kulik; Thomas L Spray; Akbar Akbary; Richard P Miller; Gil Wernovsky Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: J Edelson; R Stroshane; D P Benziger; R Cody; J Benotti; W B Hood; K Chatterjee; C Luczkowec; C Krebs; R Schwartz Journal: Circulation Date: 1986-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S G De Hert; M M Moens; P G Jorens; G L Delrue; R J DePaep; K M Vermeyen Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Gonzalo Garcia Guerra; Ari R Joffe; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Christopher S Parshuram Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Tomoyuki Mizuno; Katja M Gist; Zhiqian Gao; Michael F Wempe; Jeffrey Alten; David S Cooper; Stuart L Goldstein; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Christoph P Hornik; Ram Yogev; Peter M Mourani; Kevin M Watt; Janice E Sullivan; Andrew M Atz; David Speicher; Amira Al-Uzri; Michelle Adu-Darko; Elizabeth H Payne; Casey E Gelber; Susan Lin; Barrie Harper; Chiara Melloni; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Daniel Gonzalez Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Joowon Lee; Gi Beom Kim; Hye Won Kwon; Bo Sang Kwon; Eun Jung Bae; Chung Il Noh; Hong Gook Lim; Woong Han Kim; Jeong Ryul Lee; Yong Jin Kim Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Sarah Jane Commander; Daniel Gonzalez; Karan R Kumar; Tracy Spears; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Stephen J Balevic; Christoph P Hornik Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 1.023