AIMS: To define the pharmacokinetics of milrinone in very preterm infants and determine an optimal dose regimen to prevent low systemic blood flow in the first 12 h after birth. METHODS: A prospective open-labelled, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in two stages. In stage one, infants received milrinone at 0.25 microg/kg/min (n = 8) and 0.5 microg/kg/min (n = 11) infused from 3 to 24 h of age. Infants contributed 4-5 blood samples for concentration-time data which were analysed using a population modelling approach. A simulation study was used to explore the optimal dosing regimen to achieve target milrinone concentrations (180-300 ng/ml). This milrinone regimen was evaluated in stage two (n = 10). RESULTS: Infants (n = 29) born before 29 weeks gestation were enrolled. Milrinone pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment model with first-order elimination rate, with a population mean clearance (CV%) of 35 ml/h (24%) and volume of distribution of 512 ml (21%) and estimated half-life of 10 h. The 0.25 and 0.5 microg/kg/min dosage regimens did not achieve optimal milrinone concentration-time profiles to prevent early low systemic blood flow. Simulation studies predicted a loading infusion (0.75 microg/kg/min for 3 h) followed by maintenance infusion (0.2 microg/kg/min until 18 h of age) would provide an optimal milrinone concentration profile. This was confirmed in stage two of the study. CONCLUSION: Population pharmacokinetic modelling in the preterm infant has established an optimal dose regimen for milrinone that increases the likelihood of achieving therapeutic aims and highlights the importance of pharmacokinetic studies in neonatal clinical pharmacology.
AIMS: To define the pharmacokinetics of milrinone in very preterm infants and determine an optimal dose regimen to prevent low systemic blood flow in the first 12 h after birth. METHODS: A prospective open-labelled, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in two stages. In stage one, infants received milrinone at 0.25 microg/kg/min (n = 8) and 0.5 microg/kg/min (n = 11) infused from 3 to 24 h of age. Infants contributed 4-5 blood samples for concentration-time data which were analysed using a population modelling approach. A simulation study was used to explore the optimal dosing regimen to achieve target milrinone concentrations (180-300 ng/ml). This milrinone regimen was evaluated in stage two (n = 10). RESULTS:Infants (n = 29) born before 29 weeks gestation were enrolled. Milrinone pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment model with first-order elimination rate, with a population mean clearance (CV%) of 35 ml/h (24%) and volume of distribution of 512 ml (21%) and estimated half-life of 10 h. The 0.25 and 0.5 microg/kg/min dosage regimens did not achieve optimal milrinone concentration-time profiles to prevent early low systemic blood flow. Simulation studies predicted a loading infusion (0.75 microg/kg/min for 3 h) followed by maintenance infusion (0.2 microg/kg/min until 18 h of age) would provide an optimal milrinone concentration profile. This was confirmed in stage two of the study. CONCLUSION: Population pharmacokinetic modelling in the preterm infant has established an optimal dose regimen for milrinone that increases the likelihood of achieving therapeutic aims and highlights the importance of pharmacokinetic studies in neonatal clinical pharmacology.
Authors: Gonzalo Garcia Guerra; Ari R Joffe; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Christopher S Parshuram Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Regan E Giesinger; Kiran More; Jodie Odame; Amish Jain; Robert P Jankov; Patrick J McNamara Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Katja M Gist; David S Cooper; Julia Wrona; Sarah Faubel; Christopher Altmann; Zhiqian Gao; Bradley S Marino; Jeffrey Alten; Kristal M Hock; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Alexander A Vinks; Melanie S Joy; Michael F Wempe; Michael R Bennett; Stuart L Goldstein Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Tomoyuki Mizuno; Katja M Gist; Zhiqian Gao; Michael F Wempe; Jeffrey Alten; David S Cooper; Stuart L Goldstein; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Nicolas F M Porta; Kathryn N Farrow; Bernadette Chen; Sylvia F Gugino; Vasanth H Kumar; James A Russell; Robin H Steinhorn Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Jane P F Bai; Jeffrey S Barrett; Gibert J Burckart; Bernd Meibohm; Hari Cheryl Sachs; Lynne Yao Journal: AAPS J Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Joe Brierley; Joseph A Carcillo; Karen Choong; Tim Cornell; Allan Decaen; Andreas Deymann; Allan Doctor; Alan Davis; John Duff; Marc-Andre Dugas; Alan Duncan; Barry Evans; Jonathan Feldman; Kathryn Felmet; Gene Fisher; Lorry Frankel; Howard Jeffries; Bruce Greenwald; Juan Gutierrez; Mark Hall; Yong Y Han; James Hanson; Jan Hazelzet; Lynn Hernan; Jane Kiff; Niranjan Kissoon; Alexander Kon; Jose Irazuzta; Jose Irazusta; John Lin; Angie Lorts; Michelle Mariscalco; Renuka Mehta; Simon Nadel; Trung Nguyen; Carol Nicholson; Mark Peters; Regina Okhuysen-Cawley; Tom Poulton; Monica Relves; Agustin Rodriguez; Ranna Rozenfeld; Eduardo Schnitzler; Tom Shanley; Saraswati Kache; Sara Skache; Peter Skippen; Adalberto Torres; Bettina von Dessauer; Jacki Weingarten; Timothy Yeh; Arno Zaritsky; Bonnie Stojadinovic; Jerry Zimmerman; Aaron Zuckerberg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.598