Literature DB >> 22478364

Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective.

I Stewart, D Barnes-Holmes.   

Abstract

The current article presents a basic functional-analytic interpretation of metaphor. This work involves an extension of Skinner's (1957) interpretation of metaphor using relational frame theory (RFT). A basic RFT interpretation of a particular metaphor is outlined, according to which the metaphor acquires its psychological effects when formal stimulus dimensions are contacted via the derivation of arbitrary stimulus relations. This interpretation sees the metaphor as involving four elements: (a) establishing two separate equivalence relations, (b) deriving an equivalence relation between these relations, (c) discriminating a formal relation via this equivalence-equivalence relation, and (d) a transformation of functions on the basis of the formal relation discriminated in the third element. In the second half of the paper, a number of important issues with regard to the RFT interpretation of metaphor are addressed.

Year:  2001        PMID: 22478364      PMCID: PMC2731509          DOI: 10.1007/BF03392030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal        ISSN: 0738-6729


  8 in total

1.  Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis.

Authors:  D Barnes-Holmes; Y Barnes-Holmes; V Cullinan
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class.

Authors:  S Hayes; D Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults.

Authors:  C Pilgrim; M Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations.

Authors:  S Dymond; D Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations.

Authors:  D Barnes; M Keenan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding.

Authors:  D Steele; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  T J Spencer; P N Chase
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations.

Authors:  B Roche; D Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: a citation analysis.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Richard J May; Anita Munnelly; Alice E Hoon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  Relating derived relations as a model of analogical reasoning: reaction times and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Donal Regan; Yvonne Barnes-Holmes; Sean Commins; Derek Walsh; Ian Stewart; Paul M Smeets; Robert Whelan; Simon Dymond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.