Literature DB >> 22477953

Theory and technology in behavior analysis.

S C Hayes.   

Abstract

The differences within behaviorism in general and behavior analysis in particular have been described in many ways. Some of the more common distinctions are "basic versus applied", "clinical versus non-clinical", "behavior therapy versus behavior analysis", and "experimental analysis of behavior versus applied behavior analysis". These and other such distinctions do not seem to refer to truely important differences, or refer to important differences in confusing ways. It is suggested that there are two main dimensions which divide behaviorists into meaningful units: the type of paradigm (behavior analysis versus methodological behaviorism) and the level of analysis (technical, methodological, conceptual, or philosophical). By considering these two dimensions a number of issues in the field are recast. In particular, many of the differences within behavior analysis are recast into questions of the relationship between theory and technology.

Year:  1978        PMID: 22477953      PMCID: PMC2741803          DOI: 10.1007/bf03392370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal        ISSN: 0738-6729


  1 in total

1.  Reflections on the cognitive--learning trend in psychotherapy.

Authors:  M J Mahoney
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1977-01
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Jacques Loeb, B. F. Skinner, and the legacy of prediction and control.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

2.  Two correct definitions of "Applied".

Authors:  S M Deitz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1983

3.  A flight of behavior analysis.

Authors:  D M Baer
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1981

4.  Flight from behavior analysis.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1980

5.  The speciation of behavior analysis.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1991

6.  The acquisition and maintenance of behavioral skills: a response to Michael.

Authors:  C W Knapp
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

7.  Defining applied behavior analysis: an historical analogy.

Authors:  S M Deitz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

Review 8.  Translational research in behavior analysis: historical traditions and imperative for the future.

Authors:  F Charles Mace; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  In Dreams Begin Responsibility: Why and How to Measure the Quality of Graduate Training in Applied Behavior Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-10-02

10.  Top 10 Responses to the Commentaries on Dixon, Reed, Smith et al. (2015).

Authors:  Mark R Dixon; Derek D Reed; Tristram Smith; Jordan Belisle; Rachel E Jackson
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.