Literature DB >> 22477233

The psychological impact of a false-positive screening mammogram in Barcelona.

Rebecca Espasa1, Cristiane Murta-Nascimento, Ramón Bayés, Maria Sala, Montserrat Casamitjana, Francesc Macià, Xavier Castells.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the psychological impact of mammographic screening for women who receive negative results and for those who need additional non-invasive and invasive complementary investigations to exclude breast cancer (false positives). One hundred fifty women who attended a breast cancer screening programme in Barcelona, aged 50-69 years, were included in this study: 50 with negative results and 100 with false positive mammograms (50 underwent non-invasive and 50 underwent invasive complementary investigations). Participants worried little until they underwent mammography, but worries increased when a telephone call notified the women of the need for further testing. A substantial proportion of women requiring further assessment reported that they were at least somewhat worried about having breast cancer throughout the screening process (P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, levels of anxiety and depression, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups. In conclusion, although the women showed no psychological morbidity, there is a substantial psychological response in those with an abnormal screening mammogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22477233     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0349-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  11 in total

1.  [Prevalence of mental disorders and associated factors: results from the ESEMeD-Spain study].

Authors:  Josep M Haro; Concepció Palacín; Gemma Vilagut; Montse Martínez; Mariola Bernal; Inma Luque; Miquel Codony; Montse Dolz; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.725

2.  [Analysis of cancer incidence, survival and mortality according to the main tumoral localizations, 1985-2019: Breast cancer].

Authors:  A Izquierdo; R Gispert; F Saladie; J A Espinàs
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lampic; E Thurfjell; J Bergh; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review.

Authors:  J Brett; C Bankhead; B Henderson; E Watson; J Austoker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F J Gilbert; C M Cordiner; I R Affleck; D B Hood; D Mathieson; L G Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-12

8.  Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Eduard Molins; Francesc Macià
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distress.

Authors:  Ø Ekeberg; H Skjauff; R Kåresen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography.

Authors:  Bruno Heleno; Volkert Dirk Siersma; John Brodersen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Do current cancer follow-up care practices meet the needs of young adult cancer survivors in Canada? A qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  B Miedema; J Easley; L M Robinson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.