Literature DB >> 2247550

Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials.

S A Hackley1, M Woldorff, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

Short latency evoked potentials were recorded during a cross-modal selective attention task to evaluate recent proposals that sensory transmission in the peripheral auditory and visual pathways can be modified selectively by centrifugal mechanisms in humans. Twenty young adult subjects attended in turn to either left-ear tones or right-field flashes presented in a randomized sequence, in order to detect infrequent, lower-intensity targets. Attention-related enhancement of longer-latency components, including the visual P105 and the auditory N1/Nd waves and T-complex, showed that subjects were able to adopt a selective sensory set toward either modality. Neither the auditory evoked brainstem potentials nor the early visual components (electroretinogram, occipito-temporal N40, P50, N70 waves) were significantly affected by attention. Measures of retinal B-waves were significantly reduced in amplitude when attention was directed to the flashes, but concurrent recordings of eyelid electromyographic activity and the electro-oculogram indicated that this effect may have resulted from contamination of the retinal recordings by blink microreflex activity. A trend toward greater positivity in the 15-50 ms latency range for auditory evoked potentials to attended tones was observed. These results provide further evidence that the earliest levels of sensory transmission are unaffected by cross-modal selective attention, but that longer latency exogenous and endogenous potentials are enhanced to stimuli in the attended modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2247550     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00370.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  30 in total

1.  Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Karen Zimmerer; Ralph Huonker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: II. effects of selective intersensory attentional deployments on subsequent sensory processing.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Action-effect contingency modulates the readiness potential.

Authors:  Tiziana Vercillo; Sean O'Neil; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Schizophrenia and the retina: Towards a 2020 perspective.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Samantha I Fradkin; Docia L Demmin
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies of the effects of acute tryptophan depletion: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Paul Allen; Philip McGuire; Anna Placentino; Mariachiara Cortesi; Jorge Perez
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The interaction between pictures and words: evidence from positivity offset and negativity bias.

Authors:  Baolin Liu; Zhixing Jin; Zhongning Wang; Yu Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.