Literature DB >> 2247547

Multiple sources of P3b associated with different types of information.

D S Ruchkin1, R Johnson, H L Canoune, W Ritter, M Hammer.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated how the P3a, P3b, and Slow Wave components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) respond to manipulations of the nature, timing, and extent of information delivery. There were two experiments in which the total amount of task information was distributed between pairs of successive stimuli (S1 and S2) within each trail. The task was to predict the relation between S1 and S2. In Experiment 1, the S1 could resolve no, partial, or all uncertainty with respect to the prediction outcome (correct or incorrect). Each S1 delivered three types of information: 1) outcome information--which resolved the subjects' uncertainty about the correctness of their prediction; 2) procedural information--which resolved uncertainty about how much outcome information would be delivered by S1; and 3) memory information--the identity of S1, which had to be stored for subsequent comparison with S2. In Experiment 2, the activity of these components was contrasted in two conditions in which the S1 delivered either memory information alone or both memory and procedural information. P3a and Slow Wave were sensitive only to outcome information. P3b was sensitive to all three types of information, and its scalp topography varied as a function of the type of information. The topographic variations indicate that P3b is not a unitary phenomenon but rather is a composite of activity arising from multiple intracranial sources of bioelectric activity.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2247547     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00367.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention.

Authors:  S Makeig; M Westerfield; T P Jung; J Covington; J Townsend; T J Sejnowski; E Courchesne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Gene-environment interplay in alcoholism and other substance abuse disorders: expressions of heritability and factors influencing vulnerability.

Authors:  Tomas Palomo; R M Kostrzewa; R J Beninger; T Archer
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Wayne Khoe; George R Mangun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  P300 as a measure of cognitive dysfunction from occupational and environmental insults.

Authors:  J B Pan; T Takeshita; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Magnocellular and parvocellular influences on reflexive attention.

Authors:  Anthony J Ries; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Updating of context in working memory: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Rafael Escobedo-Quiroz; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Association Between P300 Responses to Auditory Oddball Stimuli and Clinical Outcomes in the Psychosis Risk Syndrome.

Authors:  Holly K Hamilton; Brian J Roach; Peter M Bachman; Aysenil Belger; Ricardo E Carrion; Erica Duncan; Jason K Johannesen; Gregory A Light; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Tyrone D Cannon; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Electroencephalographic brain dynamics following manually responded visual targets.

Authors:  Scott Makeig; Arnaud Delorme; Marissa Westerfield; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Jeanne Townsend; Eric Courchesne; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Evidence Integration in Natural Acoustic Textures during Active and Passive Listening.

Authors:  Urszula Górska; Andre Rupp; Yves Boubenec; Tansu Celikel; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-04-13

10.  Emotional feedback ameliorates older adults' feedback-induced learning.

Authors:  Nicola K Ferdinand; Melanie Hilz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.