Literature DB >> 11702085

Differential sensitivity to acute administration of cocaine, GBR 12909, and fluoxetine in mice selectively bred for hyperactive wheel-running behavior.

J S Rhodes1, G R Hosack, I Girard, A E Kelley, G S Mitchell, T Garland.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: To study the neural basis of genetic hyperactivity, we measured acute drug responses of mice (Mus domesticus) from four replicate lines that had been selectively bred (23-24 generations) for increased running-wheel activity.
OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that the high-running lines would respond differently to cocaine, GBR 12909, and fluoxetine (Prozac) compared with four replicate, random-bred, control lines. We also tested the hypothesis that the high-running lines would display hyperactivity in cages without wheels.
METHODS: Drug trials were conducted at night, during peak activity, after animals were habituated (3 weeks) to their cages with attached wheels. Revolutions on wheels 10-40 min post-injection were used to quantify drug responses. In a separate study, total photobeam breaks (produced on the first and second 24-h period of exposure) were used to quantify basal activity in animals deprived of wheels.
RESULTS: Cocaine and GBR 12909 decreased wheel running in selected lines by reducing the average speed but not the duration of running, but these drugs had little effect in control lines. Fluoxetine reduced running speed and duration in both selected and control animals, and the magnitude of the reduction was proportional to baseline activity. Basal activity in animals deprived of wheels (quantified using photobeam breaks) was significantly higher in selected than control lines on the second day of testing.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest an association between genetically determined hyperactive wheel-running behavior and dysfunction in the dopaminergic neuromodulatory system. Our selected lines may prove to be a useful genetic model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11702085     DOI: 10.1007/s002130100857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  29 in total

1.  Functional genomic architecture of predisposition to voluntary exercise in mice: expression QTL in the brain.

Authors:  Scott A Kelly; Derrick L Nehrenberg; Kunjie Hua; Theodore Garland; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Driven to be inactive? The genetics of physical activity.

Authors:  Trudy Moore-Harrison; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 3.  Neurogenesis and exercise: past and future directions.

Authors:  Henriette van Praag
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system affects wheel-running activity in differentially active mice.

Authors:  A M Knab; R S Bowen; A T Hamilton; J T Lightfoot
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.711

Review 5.  Animal models to guide clinical drug development in ADHD: lost in translation?

Authors:  Jeffery R Wickens; Brian I Hyland; Gail Tripp
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Maternal exposure to Western diet affects adult body composition and voluntary wheel running in a genotype-specific manner in mice.

Authors:  Layla Hiramatsu; Jarren C Kay; Zoe Thompson; Jennifer M Singleton; Gerald C Claghorn; Ralph L Albuquerque; Brittany Ho; Brett Ho; Gabriela Sanchez; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-06-15

7.  Cocaine self-administration and reinstatement in female rats selectively bred for high and low voluntary running.

Authors:  J R Smethells; N E Zlebnik; D K Miller; M J Will; F Booth; M E Carroll
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Behavioral traits are affected by selective breeding for increased wheel-running behavior in mice.

Authors:  I Jónás; K A Schubert; A C Reijne; J Scholte; T Garland; M P Gerkema; A J W Scheurink; C Nyakas; G van Dijk
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Selection for increased voluntary wheel-running affects behavior and brain monoamines in mice.

Authors:  R Parrish Waters; R B Pringle; G L Forster; K J Renner; J L Malisch; T Garland; J G Swallow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.