| Literature DB >> 22474428 |
Anna Gumieniczek1, Beata Owczarek, Bernadeta Pawlikowska.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to determine oxidative/nitrosative stress in aqueous humor of alloxan-induced hyperglycemic rabbits and to investigate the effects of two oral antidiabetic drugs, pioglitazone from peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists and repaglinide from nonsulfonylurea K(ATP) channel blockers. Ascorbic acid (AA), glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant status (TAS), lipid peroxidation products (LPO), total nitrites (NO(2)), advanced oxidized protein products (AOPP), and protein carbonyl groups (PCG) were determined using respective colorimetric and ELISA methods. In our hyperglycemic animals, AA decreased by 77%, GSH by 45%, and TAS by 66% as compared to control animals. Simultaneously, LPO increased by 78%, PCG by 60%, AOPP by 84%, and NO(2) by 70%. In pioglitazone-treated animals, AA and TAS increased above control values while GSH and PCG were normalized. In turn, LPO was reduced by 54%, AOPP by 84%, and NO(2) by 24%, in relation to hyperglycemic rabbits. With repaglinide, AA and TAS were normalized, GSH increased by 20%, while LPO decreased by 45%. Our results show that pioglitazone and repaglinide differ significantly in their ability to ameliorate the parameters like NO(2), PCG, and AOPP. In this area, the multimodal action of pioglitazone as PPARγ agonist is probably essential.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22474428 PMCID: PMC3303562 DOI: 10.1155/2012/653678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Diabetes Res ISSN: 1687-5214
Effects of pioglitazone and repaglinide on oxidative/nitrosative stress parameters in the aqueous humor of control and hyperglycemic rabbits.
| Group C | Group CP | Group CR | Group H | Group HP | Group HR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAS (mmol/mL) | 1.99 ± 0.10 | 1.96 ± 0.15 | 1.90 ± 0.15 | 0.67 ± 0.09a | 2.37 ± 0.14a,b | 1.56 ± 0.15b |
| AA ( | 12.90 ± 1.05 | 13.94 ± 0.93 | 10.03 ± 1.05 | 3.02 ± 0.38a | 21.87 ± 1.18a,b | 12.62 ± 1.36b |
| GSH (nmol/mL) | 138.7 ± 4.49 | 144.2 ± 12.84 | 117.7 ± 3.32a | 76.14 ± 6.56a | 131.4 ± 5.86b | 91.06 ± 8.17a,b |
| NO2 (nmol/mL) | 39.04 ± 2.84 | 43.67 ± 4.09 | 37.44 ± 2.5 | 113.4 ± 7.63a | 102.0 ± 8.78a | 142.5 ± 2.54a |
| LPO (nmol/mL) | 0.57 ± 0.27 | 0.89 ± 0.25 | 0.68 ± 0.023 | 2.64 ± 0.14a | 1.21 ± 0.11a,b | 1.45 ± 0.17a,b |
| PCG (nmol/mg protein) | 17.86 ± 1.36 | 16.98 ± 1.30 | 24.13 ± 1.63a | 44.49 ± 2.15a | 20.46 ± 2.96b | 40.46 ± 3.57a |
| AOPP (nmol/mg protein) | 2.53 ± 0.26 | 2.44 ± 0.26 | 2.76 ± 0.32 | 16.15 ± 2.24a | 4.31 ± 0.18a,b | 19.29 ± 0.88a,b |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). TAS: total antioxidant status, AA: ascorbic acid, GSH: glutathione, NO2: total nitrites, PCG: protein carbonyls, AOPP: advanced oxidized protein products. C: control rabbits, CP: control rabbits treated with pioglitazone, CR: control rabbits treated with repaglinide, H: hyperglycemic rabbits, HP: hyperglycemic rabbits treated with pioglitazone, HR: hyperglycemic rabbits treated with repaglinide. aSignificant at P < 0.05 versus Group C. bSignificant at P < 0.05 versus Group H.
Figure 1Correlations between GSH, LPO, and NO2 and respective protein oxidation marker, AOPP ((a)–(c)) or PCG ((d)–(f)), in hyperglycemic (Group H) and hyperglycemic pioglitazone-treated (Group HP) animals.
Blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations in control and hyperglycemic rabbits at the start and the end of experiment.
| Group | Glucose (mmol/L) | Insulin (mU/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | |
| Control (C) | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 13.16 ± 1.26 | 13.30 ± 1.12 |
| Control-pioglitazone (CP) | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.3b | 11.74 ± 0.72 | 14.12 ± 0.98b |
| Control-repaglinide (CR) | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.3a,b,∗ | 12.83 ± 1.01 | 20.0 ± 1.42a,b,∗ |
| Hyperglycemic (H) | 26.3 ± 2.3a | 24.9 ± 2.8a | 3.21 ± 0.63a | 2.79 ± 0.79a |
| Hyperglycemic-pioglitazone (HP) | 27.2 ± 0.3a | 23.9 ± 1.8a | 2.31 ± 0.15 | 2.01 ± 0.34a |
| Hyperglycemic-repaglinide (HR) | 26.4 ± 1.2a | 24.0 ± 2.3a | 2.32 ± 0.15a | 2.02 ± 0.04a |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). aSignificant at P < 0.05 versus Group C. bSignificant at P < 0.05 versus Group H. *Significant at P < 0.05 versus start.