OBJECTIVE: Although the systematic measurement of disease activity facilitates clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), no recommendations currently exist on which measures should be applied in clinical practice in the US. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) convened a Working Group (WG) to comprehensively evaluate the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of available RA disease activity measures and derive recommendations for their use in clinical practice. METHODS: The Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Disease Activity Measures Working Group conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify RA disease activity measures. Using exclusion criteria, input from an Expert Advisory Panel (EAP), and psychometric analysis, a list of potential measures was created. A survey was administered to rheumatologists soliciting input. The WG used these survey results in conjunction with the psychometric analyses to derive final recommendations. RESULTS: Systematic review of the literature resulted in identification of 63 RA disease activity measures. Application of exclusion criteria and ratings by the EAP narrowed the list to 14 measures for further evaluation. Practicing rheumatologists rated 9 of these 14 measures as most useful and feasible. From these 9 measures, the WG selected 6 with the best psychometric properties for inclusion in the final set of ACR-recommended RA disease activity measures. CONCLUSION: We recommend the Clinical Disease Activity Index, Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein), Patient Activity Scale (PAS), PAS-II, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data with 3 measures, and Simplified Disease Activity Index because they are accurate reflections of disease activity; are sensitive to change; discriminate well between low, moderate, and high disease activity states; have remission criteria; and are feasible to perform in clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: Although the systematic measurement of disease activity facilitates clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), no recommendations currently exist on which measures should be applied in clinical practice in the US. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) convened a Working Group (WG) to comprehensively evaluate the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of available RA disease activity measures and derive recommendations for their use in clinical practice. METHODS: The Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Disease Activity Measures Working Group conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify RA disease activity measures. Using exclusion criteria, input from an Expert Advisory Panel (EAP), and psychometric analysis, a list of potential measures was created. A survey was administered to rheumatologists soliciting input. The WG used these survey results in conjunction with the psychometric analyses to derive final recommendations. RESULTS: Systematic review of the literature resulted in identification of 63 RA disease activity measures. Application of exclusion criteria and ratings by the EAP narrowed the list to 14 measures for further evaluation. Practicing rheumatologists rated 9 of these 14 measures as most useful and feasible. From these 9 measures, the WG selected 6 with the best psychometric properties for inclusion in the final set of ACR-recommended RA disease activity measures. CONCLUSION: We recommend the Clinical Disease Activity Index, Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein), Patient Activity Scale (PAS), PAS-II, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data with 3 measures, and Simplified Disease Activity Index because they are accurate reflections of disease activity; are sensitive to change; discriminate well between low, moderate, and high disease activity states; have remission criteria; and are feasible to perform in clinical settings.
Authors: S M M Verstappen; J W G Jacobs; M J van der Veen; A H M Heurkens; Y Schenk; E J ter Borg; A A M Blaauw; J W J Bijlsma Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Y P M Goekoop-Ruiterman; J K de Vries-Bouwstra; P J S M Kerstens; M M J Nielen; K Vos; D van Schaardenburg; I Speyer; P E H Seys; F C Breedveld; C F Allaart; B A C Dijkmans Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Dimitrios Boumpas; Gerd Burmester; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Maarten de Wit; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Alan Gibofsky; Juan Jesus Gomez-Reino; Boulos Haraoui; Joachim Kalden; Edward C Keystone; Tore K Kvien; Iain McInnes; Emilio Martin-Mola; Carlomaurizio Montecucco; Monika Schoels; Désirée van der Heijde; Desirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Valerie P K Nell; Tanja Stamm; Martin Uffmann; Stephan Pflugbeil; Klaus Machold; Josef S Smolen Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Bing Lu; Zhi Yu; Cassandra Corrigan; Leslie R Harrold; Josef S Smolen; Liana Fraenkel; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Elena Losina; Bing Lu; Agnes Zak; Cassandra Corrigan; Sara B Lee; Jenifer Agosti; Asaf Bitton; Leslie R Harrold; Theodore Pincus; Helga Radner; Zhi Yu; Josef S Smolen; Liana Fraenkel; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Brandon Pleman; Michelle Park; Xingyi Han; Lori Lyn Price; Raveendhara R Bannuru; William F Harvey; Jeffrey B Driban; Chenchen Wang Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 2.980