Literature DB >> 22472810

Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon in lumbar and thoracolumbar fusions with the use of an intraoperative computed tomographic 3-dimensional imaging system.

Kalil G Abdullah1, Frank S Bishop, Daniel Lubelski, Michael P Steinmetz, Edward C Benzel, Thomas E Mroz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective clinical research article.
OBJECTIVE: The primary goals were to determine (1) radiation exposure to the spine surgeon with the use of an intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging system and (2) to define the safe distance from the computed tomographic scanner. SUMMARY OF
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiation exposure to the spinal surgeon has been assessed during 2-dimensional fluoroscopy but has not been investigated during intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging.
METHODS: Ten patients undergoing lumbar or thoracolumbar fusion were enrolled in a prospective trial to determine the radiation exposure to a spine surgeon standing in the substerile room, with the use of the O-ARM Imaging System (Medtronic, Memphis, TN). A thermolucent digital dosimeter was worn at chest level without a lead apron. Dosimeter readings and distance from the spine surgeon were recorded. RESULTS.: Average surgeon exposure was 44.22 ± 17.4 μrem (range: 17.71-70.76 μrem). The mean distance from the O-ARM was 4.56 ± .32 m, and the surgeon was exposed for an average of 19.6 ± 5.7 seconds (range: 8.05-28.7 s). The annual number of necessary procedures required to surpass the exposure limit, according to the data presented here, would be 113,071 operations using O-ARM. Hence, the number of necessary procedures for O-ARM use is predicted to be 1,130,710 annual procedures to reach the occupational exposure limits for extremity, skin, and all other organs and 339,213 procedures to reach the limits for the lens of eye.
CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure is minimal to the surgical team during routine use of the O-ARM imaging system. The number of procedures required to surpass occupational exposure limits is high if using appropriate distance from the O-ARM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22472810     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825786d8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

1.  A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kleck; Ian Cullilmore; Matthew LaFleur; Emily Lindley; Mark E Rentschler; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Intraoperative 3D imaging in spinal surgery].

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Combining pedicle screw stimulation with spinal navigation, a protocol to maximize the safety of neural elements and minimize radiation exposure in thoracolumbar spine instrumentation.

Authors:  Sebouh Z Kassis; Loay K Abukwedar; Abdul Karim Msaddi; Catalin N Majer; Walid Othman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intraoperative navigation for accurate midline placement of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and total disc replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Joshua Xu; Monish M Maharaj; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

5.  Accuracy of navigated and conventional iliosacral screw placement in B- and C-type pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Josephine Berger-Groch; Marie Lueers; Johannes Maria Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Darius Thiesen; Jan Philipp Kolb; Maximilian Johannes Hartel; Lars Gerhard Grossterlinden
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring - a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients.

Authors:  Martin James Wood; Jason McMillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Surgical treatment of adult and pediatric C1/C2 subluxation with intraoperative computed tomography guidance.

Authors:  Ji Min Ling; Rajendra Tiruchelvarayan; Wan T Seow; Hua Bi Ng
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-22

9.  Puncture Reduction in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy with HE's Lumbar LOcation (HELLO) System: A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Guoxin Fan; Xiaofei Guan; Qi Sun; Annan Hu; Yanjie Zhu; Guangfei Gu; Hailong Zhang; Shisheng He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jacob D Smith; Megan M Jack; Nicholas R Harn; Judson R Bertsch; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.