Literature DB >> 22472410

Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study.

Hyung Joon Han1, Sae Byeol Choi, Wan Bae Kim, Jin-Suk Lee, Yoon Jung Boo, Tae Jin Song, Sung Ock Suh, Sang Yong Choi.   

Abstract

The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) are proportionate to injury; it is the most commonly used quantitative marker in surgical studies. Cytokines and the acute-phase response play an important role in controlling the human immune system. The objective of this study was to compare the systemic acute cytokine response and clinical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We compared patients who underwent single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (the single port group) with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (the conventional group) according to the clinical variables, IL-6, leukocyte subpopulations, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. The mean age in the single port group was significantly younger (P = 0.010) and the mean operation time in the conventional group was significantly shorter (P = 0.002). Postoperative 4-hour VAS pain score was slightly worse in the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group, but was not significantly different. We found no difference in clinical outcomes, the level of serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, leukocyte subpopulations, and complications between the two groups. Stress response in single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equal to conventional surgery. Postoperative 4-hour VAS pain score was slightly worse and the operation time is significantly longer in the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22472410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

1.  A Novel Approach to Major Surgery: Tracking Its Pathophysiologic Footprints.

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Martin Hübner; Pauline Coti-Bertrand; François Pralong; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term review from a single center.

Authors:  Shuodong Wu; Chao Lv; Yu Tian; Ying Fan; Hong Yu; Jing Kong; Yongnan Li; Xiaopeng Yu; Dianbo Yao; Yongsheng Chen; Jinyan Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gall Bladder Polyps.

Authors:  Chan Joong Choi; Young Hoon Roh; Min Chan Kim; Hong Jo Choi; Young Hoon Kim; Ghap Joong Jung
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liangyuan Geng; Changhua Sun; Jianfeng Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMUNOLOGICAL PROFILES IN WOMEN UNDERGOING CONVENTIONAL AND SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.

Authors:  Marisa de Carvalho Borges; Tharsus Dias Takeuti; Guilherme Azevedo Terra; Betânia Maria Ribeiro; Virmondes Rodrigues-Júnior; Eduardo Crema
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.