Literature DB >> 26534769

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term review from a single center.

Shuodong Wu1, Chao Lv2, Yu Tian2, Ying Fan2, Hong Yu2, Jing Kong2, Yongnan Li2, Xiaopeng Yu2, Dianbo Yao2, Yongsheng Chen2, Jinyan Han2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, researches about single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) are various, but long-term reviews assessing relevant complications after SILC with considerable amount of case series are rare. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a large series of 529 patients undergoing SILC to assess the long-term postoperative recovery, including postoperative complications, retained symptoms, and quality of life. Finally, we assessed its associated risk factors related to SILC patients' recovery in the long term.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 36.8 ± 8.8 months after SILC, 402 (76.0 %) patients underwent complete resolution. Frequent diarrhea (12.1 %) and recurrent omphalitis (5.9 %) were most commonly seen among other complications and retained symptoms within overall the patients. We identified 1 (0.3 %) incision hernia and 1 (0.3 %) intra-abdominal abscess among overall the patients, while 3 (0.8 %) common bile duct stones and 1 (0.3 %) biliary pancreatitis among the patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis during long-term review period. No significant differences were identified between patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and gallbladder polyps when considering other incidences (all p > 0.05). Patients undergoing SILC with older age (p = 0.023) or female gender (p = 0.020) contributed to complete resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: SILC via traditional devices is feasible and safe with acceptable postoperative incidence rate in the long run. Patients with older age or female gender, who have no severe systemic diseases, tend to benefit more from the surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term review; Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC); Traditional devices

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26534769     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4618-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  73 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Guo Cao; Wang Cai; Ming Fang Qin; Hong Zhi Zhao; Ping Yue; Yang Li
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Colonic motility in chronic ulcerative proctosigmoiditis and the effects of nicotine on colonic motility in patients and healthy subjects.

Authors:  B Coulie; M Camilleri; A E Bharucha; W J Sandborn; D Burton
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video).

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Nicolas Buchs; Sandrine Ostermann; Fadi Charara; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Sigi Joseph; B Todd Moore; G Brent Sorensen; John W Earley; Fengming Tang; Phil Jones; Kimberly M Brown
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain.

Authors:  M Asakuma; M Hayashi; K Komeda; T Shimizu; F Hirokawa; Y Miyamoto; J Okuda; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Bile acid-mediated postcholecystectomy diarrhea.

Authors:  F L Arlow; A A Dekovich; R J Priest; W T Beher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-07

10.  Postcholecystectomy symptoms. A prospective study of gall stone patients before and two years after surgery.

Authors:  E Ros; D Zambon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of post-operative complication in single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective analysis in 817 cases from a surgeon.

Authors:  Yongmin Lee; Younghoon Roh; Minchan Kim; Younghoon Kim; Kwanwoo Kim; Sunghwa Kang; Eunjeong Jang
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.