| Literature DB >> 22472016 |
Andreas Homolka1, Thomas Eder, Dieter Kopecky, Maria Berenyi, Kornel Burg, Silvia Fluch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rise of temperatures and shortening of available water as result of predicted climate change will impose significant pressure on long-lived forest tree species. Discovering allelic variation present in drought related genes of two Austrian oak species can be the key to understand mechanisms of natural selection and provide forestry with key tools to cope with future challenges.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22472016 PMCID: PMC3420255 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Comparison between raw data and preprocessed reads
| | | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak 1 | 30,207 | 5.72 | 189.45 | 22,826 | 5.11 | 200.96 |
| Oak 2 | 38,797 | 8.55 | 220.43 | 29,290 | 7.71 | 239.25 |
| Oak 3 | 31,731 | 6.70 | 211.29 | 24,336 | 6.08 | 229.92 |
| Oak 4 | 31,874 | 7.63 | 239.31 | 26,063 | 7.10 | 248.58 |
| Oak 5 | 33,645 | 8.68 | 258.07 | 30,619 | 8.38 | 180.76 |
| Oak 6 | 30,008 | 6.95 | 231.72 | 23,650 | 6.39 | 246.25 |
| Oak 7 | 29,307 | 7.07 | 241.34 | 23,909 | 6.61 | 252.14 |
| Oak 8 | 28,061 | 6.49 | 231.16 | 20,927 | 5.61 | 244.92 |
| Total | 253,630 | 57.80 | 227.85 | 201,620 | 52.98 | 230.35 |
Figure 1 Distribution of all reads after preprocessing. Amount of reads lost due to technical reasons including sequences shorter than 90 bp, reads with corrupt barcode or primer and remaining reads are displayed.
Recovery statistics and individual coverage
| 27 | 18 | 291 | (86.6%) | 9,327 | 32.05 | |
| 28 | 16 | 292 | (86.9%) | 13,189 | 45.17 | |
| 22 | 99 | n.a. | | n.a. | n.a. | |
| 8 | 9 | 319 | (94.9%) | 11,941 | 37.43 | |
| 25 | 2 | 309 | (92.0%) | 16,102 | 52.11 | |
| 18 | 5 | 313 | (93.2%) | 20,409 | 65.20 | |
| 11 | 2 | 323 | (96.1%) | 22,628 | 70.06 | |
| 7 | 4 | 325 | (96.7%) | 11,364 | 34.97 | |
| 15 | 9 | 312 | (92.9%) | 9,898 | 31.72 | |
| Average | 18 | 18 | 310 | (92.3%) | 14,357 | 46.09 |
| Total | 161 | 164 | 2,484 | 114,858 | ||
Polymorphisms detected
| 10 | 10 | 1.667 | 0.249 | 0.404 | 0.134 | 0.000 | 2.75 | |
| 19 | 52 | 6.656 | 0.481 | 0.851 | 0.189 | 0.030 | 5.97 | |
| 26 | 27 | 2.602 | 0.551 | 0.619 | 0.112 | 0.000 | 7.24 | |
| 34 | 49 | 5.079 | 0.640 | 0.803 | 0.095 | 0.000 | 12.23 | |
| 34 | 13 | 2.849 | 0.260 | 0.648 | 0.228 | 0.000 | 13.71 | |
| 7 | 10 | 1.817 | 0.209 | 0.444 | 0.182 | 0.000 | 3.37 | |
| 15 | 12 | 1.638 | 0.274 | 0.391 | 0.111 | 0.000 | 4.79 | |
| 13 | 10 | 1.253 | 0.115 | 0.202 | 0.115 | 0.000 | 3.61 | |
| Average | 19.75 | 22.88 | 2.945 | 0.347 | 0.545 | 0.146 | 0.004 | 6.71 |
| Total | 158 | 183 | 23.561 |
S Number of polymorphic sites, Na number of alleles, Ne effective number of alleles, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity, Fn frequency of null alleles, HWE test for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p-value)
Figure 2 Allelic coverage distribution. Number of alleles found in different classes of fold coverage is displayed.
Summary data of candidate genes
| Auxin responsive factor 16 | FP033974 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-CAGTTGATGTTGGTTGGACA-3′ | 55 | 363 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-ACAATAAACAAATGCTACTCA-3′ | ||||
| Beta-amylase 1 | FP061723 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-TGCATTGCCTCGTTATGATG-3′ | 59 | 318 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-TGAAACCATGGGTGAAACCT-3′ | ||||
| Dehydrin 2 | FP045825 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-AGCAGCAGCAAGGTC-3′ | 62 | 309 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-CCTTGATCTTCTCCATCACTCC-3′ | ||||
| Heat shock cognate protein 80 | FP041070 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-AGAATGACAAATCAGTGAAGGA-3′ | 59 | 359 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-CGCATCAAAGCAATAGCAAA-3′ | ||||
| Germin-like protein 3A | FP024682 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-GGAGACCTGGGCTTGAACTA-3′ | 59 | 344 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-TGTCAATGGCCTTGGAATTT-3′ | ||||
| Desiccation protectant protein Lea14 | FP049285 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-TGTGCAGATGGGGACATAGA-3′ | 57 | 278 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-TGCAACAAAAATTGAAGATAGGAA-3′ | ||||
| Prolin-rich protein | FP031479 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-GCTTCTTAGTGCTTGCCAAAA-3′ | 60 | 248 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-TCAGATTTCAGCCCATCTGAG-3′ | ||||
| Peroxidase 64 | FP051623 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-CAACCACCACAGCATTTGAC-3′ | 62 | 208 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-CCTAATCTCTTGCCCACCAG-3′ | ||||
| Aquaporin PIP1-2 | FP040796 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-CTGTGGTAAAGGGCTTCCAA-3′ | 58 | 313 | |
| | Re: 5′-M13Re-ACACTGCAAACCCAATAGGC-3′ | ||||
| Responsive to desiccation 26 | FN712698 | Fw: 5′-M13Fw-AATTATTGGTGACATTGATTTG-3′ | |||
| Re: 5′-M13Re-GGGGCTTTTCCAATATAGAAT-3′ | 54 | 360 | |||
Accession GeneBank accession number, Ta annealing temperature of gene specific primers
PCR settings
| 20 | 25 | 4 | |
| 25 | 26 | 4 | |
| 25 | 27 | 3 | |
| 20 | 28 | 4 | |
| 25 | 27 | 3 | |
| 25 | 32 | 4 | |
| 25 | 26 | 3 | |
| 25 | 28 | 4 | |
| 20 | 26 | 4 | |
| 25 | 26 | 3 |
Figure 3Flow chart of the bioinformatic pipeline developed for the analysis of a 454 amplicon resequencing experiment using freely available tools and custom Perl scripts.