| Literature DB >> 22471961 |
Raoul Droeser1, Inti Zlobec, Ergin Kilic, Uwe Güth, Michael Heberer, Giulio Spagnoli, Daniel Oertli, Coya Tapia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical relevance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer is controversial. Here, we used a tumor microarray including a large series of ductal and lobular breast cancers with long term follow up data, to analyze clinical impact of TIL expressing specific phenotypes and distribution of TILs within different tumor compartments and in different histological subtypes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22471961 PMCID: PMC3362763 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinico-pathological characteristics of patient cohort
| Feature | Frequency n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| pT1 | 369 (41.3) | 52 (31.7) | |
| pT2 | 475 (53.1) | 90 (54.9) | |
| pT3 | 50 (5.6) | 22 (13.4) | |
| pN0 | 485 (54.3) | 90 (54.9) | |
| pN1 | 340 (38.0) | 67 (40.8) | |
| pN2 | 69 (7.7) | 7 (4.3) | |
| IA | 254 (28.4) | 39 (23.8) | |
| IIA | 325 (36.4) | 54 (32.9) | |
| IIB | 211 (23.6) | 42 (25.6) | |
| IIIA | 104 (11.6) | 29 (17.7) | |
| G1 | 181 (20.4) | 24 (14.7) | |
| G2 | 372 (41.9) | 118 (72.4) | |
| G3 | 334 (37.7) | 21 (12.9) | |
| Negative | 200 (23.7) | 22 (14.4) | |
| Positive | 645 (76.3) | 131 (85.6) | |
| Negative | 346 (52.6) | 65 (54.6) | |
| Positive | 312 (47.4) | 54 (45.4) | |
| 0 and 1+ | 680 (83.1) | 130 (94.2) | |
| 2+ and 3+ | 138 (16.9) | 8 (5.8) | |
| Luminal A | 160 (40.1) | 30 (48.4) | |
| Luminal B | 7 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Her2/neu | 64 (16.0) | 3 (4.8) | |
| Triple Negative | 168 (42.1) | 29 (46.8) | |
| death from breast cancer | 72 (8.7) | 9 (5.8) | |
| Censored | 760 (91.3) | 145 (94.2) | |
| 5-year (95%CI) | 94.0 (92-96) | 97.0 (92-99) | |
| Death | 172 (19.4) | 34 (21.3) | |
| Censored | 714 (80.6) | 126 (78.7) | |
| 5-year (95%CI) | 85.6 (83-88) | 87.8 (81-92) | |
| median | 62 | 64 | |
| Minimum-maximum | 28-94 | 38-90 | |
Figure 1Examples of CD4. A, B, C: Immunohistochemical staining of breast cancer tissue punches incubated with anti-CD4 antibody (brown staining): A: Ductal breast cancer with predominantly stromal and intratumoral CD4+ cells. B: Ductal breast cancer with prominent cell pleomorphism and easily detectable intratumoral CD4+ cells, within the tumor and surrounding it. C: Example of an invasive lobular breast cancer with CD4+ cells. D; E: Zoom of breast cancers incubated with anti-FOXP3 antibody (brown staining): D: Invasive ductal breast cancer with clear intratumoral infiltration by FOXP3+ cells. E: Invasive lobular breast cancer with stromal and intratumoral FOXP3+ cells. F: Ductal breast cancer showing a single infiltrating IL-17+ cell (brown staining). G/H: Ductal carcinoma with a FOXP3/CD4 ratio > 1. G shows the FOXP3 staining and H the CD4 staining. I/J: Lobular cancer with a FOXP3/CD4 ratio < 1. I shows the FOXP3 staining and J the CD4 staining.
Figure 2Examples of CD3 and CD163 specific staining. Immunohistochemistry of invasive ductal breast cancer infiltrated by CD3+ (A, C) and CD163+ (B, D) cells (brown staining) in tumor samples with FOXP3/CD4 ratios > 1 (A, B) and < 1 (C, D).
Figure 3Box plot analysis of CD4. Box plot analysis of lymphocyte infiltration in ductal versus lobular carcinoma for CD4+, FOXP3+ and IL-17+ TILs. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, only p < 0.001 was considered statistically significant.
Correlation of CD4+ and FOXP3+ TILs and B.R.E. grade of ductal carcinomas
| Ductal carcinoma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9 ± 21.2 | 18.0 ± 24.3 | 21.2 ± 26.2 | ||
| 4.8 ± 10.7 | 7.0 ± 11.4 | 11.2 ± 15.6 | ||
| 7.5 ± 17.2 | 12.3 ± 20.1 | 14.8 ± 20.2 | ||
| 1.8 ± 5.8 | 3.1 ± 7.2 | 6.1 ± 11.8 | ||
Mean ± SD, counts of immunoreactive lymphocytes CD4+ and FOXP3+ Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; *after adjustment for multiple comparisons, only p < 0.001 was considered statistically significant
Correlation of CD4+ and FOXP3+ TILs with hormone receptor and her2/neu status in ductal carcinomas
| Compartment/TIL subtype | ER status | PR status | Her2/neu | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.1 ± 29.7 | 15.6 ± 22.9 | 12.4 ± 19.3 | 17.9 ± 25.2 | 17.0 ± 24.5 | 22.4 ± 27.4 | ||||
| 11.9 ± 16.1 | 6.9 ± 11.3 | 8.6 ± 13.4 | 6.7 ± 10.9 | 7.6 ± 12.6 | 10.6 ± 13.0 | ||||
| 17.5 ± 23.4 | 10.7 ± 18.5 | 8.2 ± 13.6 | 12.7 ± 21.6 | 11.7 ± 19.7 | 15.6 ± 21.8 | ||||
| 7.0 ± 12.8 | 3.0 ± 7.0 | 4.0 ± 9.2 | 2.7 ± 6.1 | 3.7 ± 8.7 | 4.7 ± 8.1 | ||||
Mean ± SD, counts of immunoreactive lymphocytes CD4+ and FOXP3+ Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; *after adjustment for multiple comparisons, only p < 0.001 was considered statistically significant
Figure 4Overall survival analysis in patients with ductal breast cancer. A: Overall survival in patients with ductal carcinomas and high and low level of CD4+ TILs. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (univariate-analysis) of ductal breast cancers and overall survival in patients with high level of CD4+ versus low level of CD4+ cells infiltrating the tumor. CD4+ infiltrating cells: high level of CD4+ violet curve; low level of CD4+ black curve. Patients with high level of CD4+ cell infiltration show a significant (p = 0.031) worse survival (cut-off established by ROC curves: > 6 CD4+ TILs). B: Overall survival in patients with ductal carcinomas according to total FOXP3/CD4 ratio > or < 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (univariate-analysis) of ductal breast cancers and overall survival in patients with ratio of total FOXP3+/CD4+ cells > 1 (blue curve) or < 1 (black curve). Patients with a > 1 ratio had a significantly better survival (p = 0.0005).