| Literature DB >> 15847702 |
Harlinde De Schutter1, Willy Landuyt, Erik Verbeken, Laurence Goethals, Robert Hermans, Sandra Nuyts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several parameters of the tumor microenvironment, such as hypoxia, inflammation and angiogenesis, play a critical role in tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. A major question remains if these markers can be used to stratify patients to certain treatment protocols. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-relationship and the prognostic significance of several biological and clinicopathological parameters in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15847702 PMCID: PMC1097720 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics and treatment modalities
| mean (min-max) | 56 (36–82) | 58 (42–79) | |
| M | 60 | 31 | |
| F | 7 | 3 | |
| T1 | 2 | 1 | |
| T2 | 17 | 13 | |
| T3 | 27 | 7 | |
| T4 | 21 | 13 | |
| N0 | 15 | 11 | |
| N1 | 12 | 3 | |
| N2 | 31 | 17 | |
| N3 | 9 | 3 | |
| glottic | 3 | 2 | |
| supraglottic | 16 | 10 | |
| hypopharynx | 20 | 7 | |
| oropharynx | 24 | 14 | |
| oral cavity | 2 | 0 | |
| nasopharynx | 2 | 1 | |
| 66 Gy/ 2 Gy | 20 | 4 | |
| 70 Gy/1.4 Gy | 4 | 1 | |
| 70 Gy/2 Gy | 41 (2+ cisplatinum) | 28 (1+cisplatinum) | |
| 80.5 Gy/1.15 Gy | 2 (1+cisplatinum) | 1 (+ cisplatinum) | |
Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics and treatment modalities are shown for Group A and Group B, both subgroups of the original study of CT-determined tumoral perfusion in patients with HNSCC treated by radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Cisplatinum was given at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22 and 43.
cT: clinical tumor stage. cN: clinical nodal stage. M: male. F: female. Gy: Gray.
Figure 1Example of immunohistochemistry for CA IX. Example of biopsy stained for CA IX (×100). This tumor was scored highly positive.
Figure 2Example of immunohistochemistry for CA IX. Example of biopsy stained for CA IX (×100). This tumor showed a small positive percentage.
Figure 3Example of immunohistochemistry for GLUT-1. Example of biopsy stained for GLUT-1 (×40). This tumor was scored highly positive.
Figure 4Example of immunohistochemistry for GLUT-1. Example of biopsy stained for GLUT-1 (×40). This tumor showed a small positive percentage.
Multivariate analysis for Group A
| T1-2 vs. T3-4 | 1.21 | 0.58–2.53 | 0.62 | 2.74 | 0.99–7.62 | 1.40 | 0.70–2.83 | 0.34 | 3.85 | 1.46–10.18 | ||
| N 0-1-2 vs. N3 | 3.75 | 1.47–9.60 | 7.68 | 2.72–21.70 | 5.70 | 2.34–13.85 | 6.05 | 2.32–15.77 | ||||
| Differentiation | 1.50 | 0.90–2.49 | 0.12 | 1.64 | 0.89–3.02 | 0.11 | 1.49 | 0.93–2.40 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.45–1.47 | 0.49 |
| Perfusion > median | 0.55 | 0.28–1.09 | 0.09 | 1.07 | 0.46–2.51 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 0.32–1.15 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.48–0.88 | 0.28 |
| GLUT-1 & CA IX > median | 2.33 | 1.12–4.82 | 2.24 | 0.97–11.58 | 0.06 | 2.06 | 1.05–4.07 | 1.53 | 0.65–3.60 | 0.33 | ||
Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) for Group A towards local control, regional control, disease-free survival and overall survival. Significant P values are marked in bold. RR: relative risk. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 5Correlation between CT-determined tumoral perfusion and pretreatment VEGF serum levels. There was a trend for poorer CT-determined tumoral perfusion to correlate with higher pretreatment VEGF serum levels (rS = -0.32, p = 0.06; n = 34).
Figure 6Kaplan-Meier curve local control analysis. There was a significant difference in local control between patients with pretreatment IL-6 serum levels above and below the median (9.3 vs. 70.4% at 2 years, p = 0.03).
Figure 7Kaplan-Meier curve overall survival analysis. There was a highly significant difference in overall survival between patients with pretreatment IL-6 serum levels above and below the median (11.9 vs. 74.9% at 5 years, p = 0.0009)
Univariate and multivariate analysis for pretreatment IL-6 serum levels (Group B)
| Univariate | 0.98 | 1.39–9.78 | 1.29 | 0.37–4.53 | 0.68 | 3.24 | 1.25–8.50 | 8.30 | 2.44–28.50 | |||
| Multivariate | 4.06 | 1.40–11.70 | 1.80 | 0.40–8.17 | 0.45 | 3.39 | 1.22–9.39 | 7.61 | 1.82–31.80 | |||
Univariate and multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) for IL-6 (> or < median) towards local control, regional control, disease-free survival and overall survival. Significant P values are marked in bold. RR: relative risk. CI: confidence interval.