| Literature DB >> 22470281 |
Suely Maria Rodrigues1, Ana Cristina Oliveira, Andréa Maria Duarte Vargas, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Efigênia Ferreira E Ferreira.
Abstract
This study aimed was to test the association between quality of life and edentulism among elderly individuals in a city in southeastern Brazil. This cross-sectional study was carried out with 163 individuals aged 60 years or older, functionally independent and non-institutionalized. Data were collected with a questionnaire and oral examination. The edentulism was the dependent variable. The independent variables were sex, age, household income and quality of life (WHOQOL-Old) and their scores. To assess the association between the dependent variable and independent variables was used bivariate analysis (p < 0.10). Poisson regression model was performed, adjusting for age and sex. The average age of participants was 69 years (± 6.1), 68.7% were female and 52.8% were diagnosed as completely edentulous (90% CI: 0.33-1.24). When the independent variables were associated to the prevalence of edentulism, statistically significant associations were found for age (p = 0.03) and social participation dimension of the WHOQOL-Old (p = 0.08). In the Poisson regression, social participation remained statistically associated to edentulism {RP = 2.12 [90% CI (1.10-4.00)]}. The social participation proved to have a significant association to edentulism, thereby attesting to the negative effect of this condition on social aspects.Entities:
Keywords: aged; dental care for aged; dentistry; health of the elderly; oral health; quality of life
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22470281 PMCID: PMC3315080 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9010100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Description of dimensions on the WHOQOL-Old.
| Dimensions | Content | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Functioning of senses | Impact of loss of functioning of senses on quality of life | 01, 02, 10, 20 |
| Autonomy | Independence; capability of being free to live with autonomy and make one’s own decisions | 12, 13, 15, 19 |
| Past, present and future activities | Satisfaction with life achievements and goals to be reached | 03, 04, 05, 11 |
| Social participation | Participation in activities of daily living, especially in the community | 14, 16, 17, 18 |
| Death and dying | Worries and fear regarding death and dying | 06, 07, 08, 09 |
| Intimacy | Being capable of intimate and personal relationships | 21, 22, 23, 24 |
Source: The WHOQOL-Old Group (2005) [6].
Distribution of scores on the WHOQOL-Old dimensions according to presence or absence of edentulism among elderly individuals (n = 163).
| WHOQOl-old dimension | Mean | Min. | 25 percentile | Median | 75 percentile | Max. | Modal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edentulous | 12.1 ± 3.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 19.0 | 9.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 11.9 ± 3.1 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 16.0 |
| Edentulous | 14.1 ± 1.6 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 | 15.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 14.1 ± 1.6 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 16.0 | 17.0 | 14.0 |
| Edentulous | 12.9 ± 1.8 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 18.0 | 14.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 13.1 ± 1.8 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 13.0 | 15.0 | 18.0 | 13.0 |
| Edentulous | 14.8 ± 1.6 | 10.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 19.0 | 16.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 8.0 | 13.0 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 19.0 | 15.0 |
| Edentulous | 14.9 ± 3.7 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 17.7 | 20.0 | 16.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 14.8 ± 3.8 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 17.0 | 20.0 | 16.0 |
| Edentulous | 12.2 ± 2.5 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 12.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 12.0 ± 2.4 | 7.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 12.0 |
| Edentulous | 81.0 ± 8.1 | 62.0 | 75.0 | 81.5 | 88.2 | 98.0 | 89.0 |
| Non-edentulous | 80.4 ± 7.6 | 62.0 | 74.0 | 81.0 | 84.5 | 98.0 | 83.0 |
Distribution of independent variations in relation to prevalence of edentulism among elderly individuals (n = 163).
| Independent variables | Edentulism | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presence (%) | Absent (%) | Total (100%) | Unadjusted prevalence ratio [CI] | ||
| Male | 23 (45.1) | 28 (54.9) | 51 | 0.18 | 0.63 [0.33–1.24] |
| Female | 63 (56.3) | 49 (43.8) | 112 | ||
| 60–68 | 38 (44.7) | 47 (55.3) | 85 | 0.50 [0.27–0.94] | |
| 69–87 | 48 (61.5) | 30 (38.5) | 78 | ||
| <2BMW | 75 (52.8) | 67 (47.2) | 142 | 0.97 | 1.01 [0.65–1.56] |
| ≥2BMW | 11 (52.4) | 10 (47.6) | 21 | ||
| 6–12 | 46 (50.5) | 45 (49.5) | 91 | 0.52 | 0.81 [0.44–1.52] |
| 13–20 | 40 (55.6) | 32 (44.4) | 72 | ||
| 9–14 | 47 (50.0) | 47 (50) | 94 | 0.41 | 0.76 [0.41–1.43] |
| 15–17 | 39 (56.5) | 30 (43.5) | 69 | ||
| 8–13 | 45 (52.3) | 41 (47.7) | 86 | 0.90 | 0.96 [0.52–1.78] |
| 14–18 | 41 (53.2) | 36 (46.8) | 77 | ||
| 8–15 | 37 (61.7) | 23 (38.3) | 60 | 1.78 [0.93–3.44] | |
| 16–19 | 49 (47.6) | 54 (52.4) | 103 | ||
| 8–16 | 64 (52.9) | 57 (47.1) | 121 | 0.95 | 1.02 [0.50–2.06] |
| 17–20 | 22 (52.4) | 20 (47.6) | 42 | ||
| 7–12 | 67 (52.8) | 60 (47.2) | 127 | 0.99 | 0.99 [0.47–2.09] |
| 13–16 | 19 (52.8) | 17 (47.2) | 36 | ||
| 62–81 | 43 (52.4) | 39 (47.6) | 82 | 0.93 | 0.97 [0.52–1.80] |
| 82–98 | 43 (53.1) | 38 (46.9) | 81 | ||
* 10% level of significance; ** BMW: Brazilian minimum wage.
Poisson regression model explaining the presence of edentulism in elderly individuals.
| Backward stepwise model ** | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variable | Ratio | Adjusted PR* [CI] |
| 2.12 [1.10–4.00] | ||
| 16–19 | 1 | |
* PR: prevalence ratio/10% level of significance; ** Adjusted for age, sex and household income.