Literature DB >> 22469169

Heat generation during implant placement in low-density bone: effect of surgical technique, insertion torque and implant macro design.

Aleksa Marković1, Tijana Mišić, Biljana Miličić, Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado, Zoran Aleksić, Ana Ðinić.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the effect of surgical technique, implant macrodesign and insertion torque on bone temperature changes during implant placement.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the in vitro study, 144 self-tapping (blueSKY(®) 4 × 10 mm; Bredent) and 144 non-self-tapping (Standard implant(®) 4.1 × 10 mm; Straumann) were placed in osteotomies prepared in pig ribs by lateral bone condensing or bone drilling techniques. The maximum insertion torque values of 30, 35 and 40 Ncm were used. Real-time bone temperature measurement during implant placement was performed by three thermocouples positioned vertically, in tripod configuration around every osteotomy, at a distance of 5 mm from it and at depths of 1, 5 and 10 mm. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U-tests and Regression analysis.
RESULTS: Significant predictor of bone temperature at the osteotomy depth of 1 mm was insertion torque (P = 0.003) and at the depth of 10-mm implant macrodesign (P = 0.029), while no significant predictor at depth of 5 mm was identified (P > 0.05). Higher insertion torque values as well as non-self-tapping implant macrodesign were related to higher temperatures. Implant placement in sites prepared by bone drilling induced significantly higher temperature increase (P = 0.021) compared with bone condensing sites at the depth of 5 mm, while no significant difference was recorded at other depths. Compared with 30 Ncm, insertion torque values of 35 and 40 Ncm produced significantly higher temperature increase (P = 0.005; P = 0.003, respectively) at the depth of 1 mm. There was no significant difference in temperature change induced by 35 and 40 Ncm, neither by implant macrodesign at all investigated depths (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of self-tapping implants with low insertion torque into sites prepared by lateral bone condensing technique might be advantageous in terms of thermal effect on bone.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22469169     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02460.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Effects of Condensation on Peri-implant Bone Density and Remodeling.

Authors:  L Wang; Y Wu; K C Perez; S Hyman; J B Brunski; U Tulu; C Bao; B Salmon; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Effect of irrigation and stainless steel drills on dental implant bed heat generation.

Authors:  B Bullon; E F Bueno; M Herrero; A Fernandez-Palacin; J V Rios; P Bullon; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Comparison of Maximum Heat Generation during Implant Site Preparation between Single and Gradual Drilling Protocols in Artificial D1 Bone Blocks: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Tammam Koutiech; Omar Ahmad Heshmeh; Kamal Alkerdi; Johnny Toumi; Laith Al Sabek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-06-18

4.  A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template.

Authors:  Shin-Young Youk; Jee-Ho Lee; Ji-Man Park; Seong-Joo Heo; Hyun-Ki Roh; Eun-Jin Park; Im Hee Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Geometrical design characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants predicting maximum insertion torque.

Authors:  Višnja Katić; Ervin Kamenar; David Blažević; Stjepan Spalj
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Intraosseous Temperature Change during Installation of Dental Implants with Two Different Surfaces and Different Drilling Protocols: An In Vivo Study in Sheep.

Authors:  Michele Stocchero; Yohei Jinno; Marco Toia; Marianne Ahmad; Evaggelia Papia; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Jonas P Becktor
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Heat Generation at the Implant-Bone Interface by Insertion of Ceramic and Titanium Implants.

Authors:  Holger Zipprich; Paul Weigl; Eugenie König; Alexandra Toderas; Ümniye Balaban; Christoph Ratka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation.

Authors:  H Pellicer-Chover; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; A Aloy-Prosper; J-C Sanchis-Gonzalez; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago; M Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-11-01

9.  Evaluation of Implants with Different Macrostructures in Type I Bone-Pre-Clinical Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio; Matusalém Silva Júnior; Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira; Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto; Rafael Silveira Faeda; Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan; Élcio Marcantonio Júnior
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Infrared Thermographic Evaluation of Temperature Modifications Induced during Implant Site Preparation with Steel vs. Zirconia Implant Drill.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Felice Lorusso; Sammy Noumbissi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.