Literature DB >> 22468460

On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models.

Morten Enemark Lund1, Mark de Zee, Michael Skipper Andersen, John Rasmussen.   

Abstract

We review the opportunities to validate multibody musculoskeletal models in view of the current transition of musculoskeletal modelling from a research topic to a practical simulation tool in product design, healthcare and other important applications. This transition creates a new need for justification that the models are adequate representations of the systems they simulate. The need for a consistent terminology and established standards is identified and knowledge from fields with a more progressed state-of-the-art in verification and validation is introduced. A number of practical steps for improvement of the validation of multibody musculoskeletal models are pointed out and directions for future research in the field are proposed. It is hoped that a more structured approach to model validation can help to improve the credibility of musculoskeletal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22468460     DOI: 10.1177/0954411911431516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Finite element analysis of the rotator cuff: A systematic review.

Authors:  Drew H Redepenning; Paula M Ludewig; John M Looft
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine.

Authors:  Marco Senteler; Bernhard Weisse; Jess G Snedeker; Dominique A Rothenfluh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change Values for Predictions of Knee Forces during Gait and Stair Ascent Derived from the FreeBody Musculoskeletal Model of the Lower Limb.

Authors:  Phil D B Price; Conor Gissane; Daniel J Cleather
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  The development of a segment-based musculoskeletal model of the lower limb: introducing FreeBody.

Authors:  Daniel J Cleather; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Does Computer-Assisted Femur First THR Improve Musculoskeletal Loading Conditions?

Authors:  Tim A Weber; Sebastian Dendorfer; Joachim Grifka; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling of the hip joint for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: A validation study based on in vivo measurements.

Authors:  Maximilian C M Fischer; Jörg Eschweiler; Fabian Schick; Malte Asseln; Philipp Damm; Klaus Radermacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Refining muscle geometry and wrapping in the TLEM 2 model for improved hip contact force prediction.

Authors:  Enrico De Pieri; Morten E Lund; Anantharaman Gopalakrishnan; Kasper P Rasmussen; David E Lunn; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.