Literature DB >> 22466286

Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence.

Leithen K M'Gonigle1, Rupert Mazzucco, Sarah P Otto, Ulf Dieckmann.   

Abstract

Empirical data indicate that sexual preferences are critical for maintaining species boundaries, yet theoretical work has suggested that, on their own, they can have only a minimal role in maintaining biodiversity. This is because long-term coexistence within overlapping ranges is thought to be unlikely in the absence of ecological differentiation. Here we challenge this widely held view by generalizing a standard model of sexual selection to include two ubiquitous features of populations with sexual selection: spatial variation in local carrying capacity, and mate-search costs in females. We show that, when these two features are combined, sexual preferences can single-handedly maintain coexistence, even when spatial variation in local carrying capacity is so slight that it might go unnoticed empirically. This theoretical study demonstrates that sexual selection alone can promote the long-term coexistence of ecologically equivalent species with overlapping ranges, and it thus provides a novel explanation for the maintenance of species diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22466286     DOI: 10.1038/nature10971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  13 in total

1.  The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus.

Authors:  T Tregenza; V L Pritchard; R K Butlin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Will sympatric speciation fail due to stochastic competitive exclusion?

Authors:  Jacob Johansson; Jörgen Ripa
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation.

Authors:  James Mallet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Space, sympatry and speciation.

Authors:  J Mallet; A Meyer; P Nosil; J L Feder
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification.

Authors:  A B Wilson; K Noack-Kunnmann; A Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones.

Authors:  N H Barton; G M Hewitt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets.

Authors:  D A Gray; W H Cade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Franz J Weissing; Pim Edelaar; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  18 in total

1.  Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation.

Authors:  Xavier Thibert-Plante; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Grey zones of sexual selection: why is finding a modern definition so hard?

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Functional plasticity in vertebrate scavenger assemblages in the presence of introduced competitors.

Authors:  Ellen L Bingham; Ben L Gilby; Andrew D Olds; Michael A Weston; Rod M Connolly; Christopher J Henderson; Brooke Maslo; Charles F Peterson; Christine M Voss; Thomas A Schlacher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Colour biases in territorial aggression in a Neotropical cichlid fish.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A stochastic model for speciation by mating preferences.

Authors:  Camille Coron; Manon Costa; Hélène Leman; Charline Smadi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Strong spatial population structure shapes the temporal coevolutionary dynamics of costly female preference and male display.

Authors:  Maximilian Tschol; Jane M Reid; Greta Bocedi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 8.  Genomics and the origin of species.

Authors:  Ole Seehausen; Roger K Butlin; Irene Keller; Catherine E Wagner; Janette W Boughman; Paul A Hohenlohe; Catherine L Peichel; Glenn-Peter Saetre; Claudia Bank; Ake Brännström; Alan Brelsford; Chris S Clarkson; Fabrice Eroukhmanoff; Jeffrey L Feder; Martin C Fischer; Andrew D Foote; Paolo Franchini; Chris D Jiggins; Felicity C Jones; Anna K Lindholm; Kay Lucek; Martine E Maan; David A Marques; Simon H Martin; Blake Matthews; Joana I Meier; Markus Möst; Michael W Nachman; Etsuko Nonaka; Diana J Rennison; Julia Schwarzer; Eric T Watson; Anja M Westram; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  On the sympatric evolution and evolutionary stability of coexistence by relative nonlinearity of competition.

Authors:  Florian Hartig; Tamara Münkemüller; Karin Johst; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The evolution of homophily.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Martin A Nowak; Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.