Literature DB >> 22464278

Bone-seeking TRAP conjugates: surprising observations and their implications on the development of gallium-68-labeled bisphosphonates.

Johannes Notni1, Jan Plutnar, Hans-Jürgen Wester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates possess strong affinity to bone. 99mTc bisphosphonate complexes are widely used for bone scintigraphy. For positron emission tomography (PET) bone imaging, Ga-68-based PET tracers based on bisphosphonates are highly desirable.
FINDINGS: Two trimeric bisphosphonate conjugates of the triazacyclononane-phosphinate (TRAP) chelator were synthesized, labeled with Ga-68, and used for microPET imaging of bone in male Lewis rats. Both Ga-68 tracers show bone uptake and, thus, are suitable for PET bone imaging. Surprisingly, Ga-71 nuclear magnetic resonance data prove that Ga(III) is not located in the chelating cavity of TRAP and must therefore be bound by the conjugated bisphosphonate units.
CONCLUSION: The intrinsic Ga-68 chelating properties of TRAP are not needed for Ga-68 PET bone imaging with TRAP-bisphosphonate conjugates. Here, TRAP serves only as a trimeric scaffold. For preparation of Ga-68-based bone seekers for PET, it appears sufficient to equip branched scaffolds with multiple bisphosphonate units, which serve both Ga-68-binding and bone-targeting purposes.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464278      PMCID: PMC3351026          DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-2-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Res            Impact factor:   3.138


Background

Geminal bisphosphonates possess strong affinity to bone [1,2]. In living organisms, administration of bisphosphonates leads to inhibition of osteoclasts (bone resorbing cells), which results in a lower rate of bone resorption [3,4]. Therapy with bisphosphonate drugs is thus performed to prevent decrease of bone density caused by osteogenesis imperfecta (brittle bone disease) [5] or osteoporosis [3,6]. In addition, bisphosphonate complexes of 99mTc (e.g., of medronic acid, '99mTc-MDP'; see Figure 1) are the mainstay of bone imaging by scintigraphy and SPECT. However, as positron emission tomography (PET) offers higher resolution and sensitivity, PET bone-imaging agents are of high interest. Direct utilization of the β+-emitting radionuclide 18 F (t1/2 = 110 min, Emax,β+ = 634 keV) is the most simple and straightforward approach because [18 F]fluoride 18 F- inherently possesses a high affinity to bone. However, 18 F is cyclotron-produced, and therefore, a full geographical coverage, comparable to the supply of generator-produced 99mTc, cannot be guaranteed. Thus, bisphosphonate mono-conjugates of the currently most popular radiometal chelators 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid [7-9] and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-triacetic acid [10] have been prepared to utilize generator-produced 68 Ga (t1/2 = 68 min, Emax,β+ = 1.9 MeV) for PET bone imaging. Advancing this approach, this pilot study describes preclinical PET imaging results for trimeric bisphosphonate conjugates of the recently introduced chelator triazacyclononane-phosphinate (TRAP) (see Figure 2) [11-13].
Figure 1

Examples for common bisphosphonate drugs.

Figure 2

Synthesis of trimeric TRAP-bisphosphonate conjugates TRAP(MDP).

Examples for common bisphosphonate drugs. Synthesis of trimeric TRAP-bisphosphonate conjugates TRAP(MDP).

Methods

General procedures and instrumentation (nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electrospray mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS), ultrafiltration/diafiltration, PET) have been described before [13]. [18 F]fluoride formulation for injection was prepared by adding 100 MBq of 18 F (obtained from routine cyclotron production at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany) to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (1 mL). Synthesis of bisphosphonate conjugates (Figure 2): TRAP·2H2O (0.3 mmol, 185 mg), diisopropylethylamide (3 mmol, 388 mg, 510 μL), and the amino-bisphosphonate (1.5 mmol); for TRAP(MDP)3, tetraethyl(aminomethylene)bisphosphonate 455 mg; and for TRAP(PDP)3, tetraethyl(1-aminopropylene)bisphosphonate 500 mg, were dissolved in DMSO (2 mL). Then, HATU (2.4 mmol, 921 mg) was added with stirring. After 25 min, the reaction mixture was diluted with water (50 mL) and subjected to diafiltration (membrane with 500 Da MWCO). After 250 mL of water had passed, the cell content was concentrated in vacuo and subjected to preparative HPLC (column: YMC C18 ec 250 × 30 mm; detection wavelength, 220 nm; eluent A, MeCN with 0.1% TFA; eluent B, water with 0.1% TFA; gradient 25% to 50% B in 20 min, tR(dodecaethyl-TRAP(MDP)3) = 12 min, tR(dodecaethyl-TRAP(PDP)3) = 16 min). After evaporation of the solvents, the remaining viscous oil was dissolved in HBr/glacial acetic acid (33%) and stirred for 3 days. Addition of methanol to the reaction mixture yielded the products as colorless, crystalline solids. Data for TRAP(MDP)3: yield 201 mg (61%); MW (calculated for C21H51N6O27P9) 1,098.43; ESI-MS negative m/z = 1,097 (M-H+) and 548 (M-2 H+); 1 H NMR (600 MHz, D2O) δ = 2.13 (m, 6 H), 2.67 (m, 6 H), 3.48 (d, 3JHH = 5.4 Hz, 6 H), 3.56 (s, broad, 12 H), and 4.71 (t, JPH = 21.3 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13 C NMR (151 MHz, D2O) δ = 26.11 (d, 1JPC = 93.18 Hz), 28.65, 52.13, 54.74 (d, 1JPC = 89.07 Hz), 47.45 (t, 1JPC = 139.28 Hz), and 174.54 (dt, 2JPC = 12.28 and 3JPC = 4.34 Hz) ppm; and 31P NMR (121 MHz, D2O) δ = 14.10 (d, 2JPP = 15.7 Hz) and 39.90 ppm. Data for TRAP(PDP)3: yield 195 mg (55%); MW (calculated for C27H63N6O27P9) 1,182.59; ESI-MS negative m/z = 1,181 (M-H+), 590 (M-2 H+), and 393 (M-3 H+); 1 H NMR (600 MHz, D2O) δ = 2.07 (m, 6 H), 2.10 (m, 6 H), 2.36 (tt, JPH = 23.52 Hz, 3JHH = 5.97 Hz, 3 H), 2.53 (m, 6 H), 3.44 (t, 3JHH = 6.3 Hz, 6 H), 3.45 (t, broad, 3JHH = 6.6 Hz), and 3.52 (s, broad, 12 H) ppm; 13 C NMR (151 MHz, D2O) δ = 25.36 (t, 2JPC = 4.2 Hz), 26.29 (d, 1JPC = 93.5 Hz), 28.63 (d, 2JPC = 3.9 Hz), 35.77 (t, 1JPC = 128.5 Hz), 39.48 (d, 3JPC = 7.4 Hz), 52.14, 54.82 (d, 1JPC = 88.6 Hz), and 175.41 (d, 3JPC = 13.1 Hz) ppm; and 31P NMR (121 MHz, D2O) δ = 21.53 (d, 2JPP = 15.5 Hz) and 39.69 ppm. 68 Ga for labeling was obtained from a SnO2-based 68Ge/68 Ga generator (iThemba LABS, Somerset West, South Africa), eluted with 1.0 M HCl. A 1.25 mL fraction of the eluate containing ca. 80% of the total activity (ca. 1.3 GBq) was adjusted to pH 3.3 by adding a solution of 600 mg 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) in 0.5 mL water. To a 90 μL aliquot of this mixture, 10 μL of 10-4 M stock solution of the ligand was added. After heating for 5 min to 95°C, the solution was passed over a cation exchanger SPE cartridge (Chromafix HR-XC M, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and purged with water (1 mL). This procedure removed non-complexed 68 Ga as well as HEPES, which was confirmed by processing of blank samples. Radiochemical yields, determined by measuring the activity on the cartridge and in the eluate, were > 85%. Formulation was done by adjusting the pH of the eluate to 7.4 by adding approximately 50 μL of a solution of NaOH (1 g) and NaH2PO4 (483 mg) in water (20 mL) while monitoring the pH with a pH meter. 'Free' 68 Ga formulation was prepared by addition of the generator eluate (40 μL, ca. 50 MBq) to PBS (1 mL), resulting in pH 7.2. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the current animal welfare regulations in Germany. Five male Lewis rats (age 7 weeks, ca. 200 g) were kept under standard laboratory conditions (12 h light/12 h dark) and given standard diet and water ad libitum. For PET, ca. 35 MBq of tracer was injected into the tail vein under isoflurane anesthesia. Two subsequent scans of 15 min were recorded 60 min post injection, using two different axial bed positions in order to image the entire animals. Images were reconstructed using a OSEM3D algorithm without scatter and attenuation correction. For each full-body maximum intensity projection (MIP), two part-body MIPs were stitched together manually using graphics software. PET images are from representative animals reflecting the group.

Results and discussion

Figure 3 shows that free 68 Ga(III) (we use this generalized term since 68 Ga species in PBS solutions are not well defined) provides almost no contrast of the skeleton over other tissues, as intravenous injection of free 68 Ga(III) predominantly results in transferrin-bound activity [14-17]. In contrast, both bisphosphonate tracers 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3 and 68 Ga-TRAP(PDP)3 bind to bone while showing low levels in blood and soft tissues. Apparently, PET image quality achieved therewith cannot compete with that of [18 F]fluoride. 18 F possesses a lower positron energy than 68 Ga, resulting in lower tissue penetration (FW20H of 0.54 mm and 2.12 mm in soft tissue for 18 F and 68 Ga, respectively [18]), and therefore in a lower degree of image blurring. However, as the difference in resolution for a clinical 3-mm PET camera is small (3.05 mm for 18 F and 3.57 mm for 68 Ga [18]), a successful application of 68 Ga bone-imaging agents in patients is not precluded.
Figure 3

PET scans (MIP, 60 min p.i.) of Lewis rats using different tracers. (A) Free 68 Ga(III), (B) 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3, (C) 68 Ga-TRAP(PDP)3, and (D) [18 F]fluoride.

PET scans (MIP, 60 min p.i.) of Lewis rats using different tracers. (A) Free 68 Ga(III), (B) 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3, (C) 68 Ga-TRAP(PDP)3, and (D) [18 F]fluoride. Upon investigation of the mode of gallium binding, we found that an equimolar mixture of 69,71 Ga3+ and either 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3 or 68 Ga-TRAP(PDP)3 does not yield any signal in 71 Ga NMR spectra, not even after heating to 95°C for hours. However, the octahedral N3O3 coordination usually found for 'in-cage' Ga(III) complexes of TRAP ligands generally yields sharp 71 Ga NMR resonances at δ = 130 to 142 ppm [11,12]. Obviously, Ga(III) ion is not located in the TRAP cavity and, therefore, must be complexed in an 'out-of-cage' manner by the bisphosphonate groups. Although this result is quite unexpected, PET images nevertheless prove that the degree of kinetic stability of these complexes is sufficiently high to carry 68 Ga to the bone and retain it there. However, Figure 3 also shows a slightly higher background uptake for 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3, most likely caused by partial decomplexation in vivo due to lower complex stability. Clearance of both 68 Ga tracers occurred faster than 18 F- and exclusively via the kidneys.

Conclusion

68 Ga-labeled trimeric bisphosphonate conjugates of TRAP were successfully applied for bone imaging in rats. Surprisingly, 71 Ga NMR investigation revealed that Ga(III) ion is not located in the macrocyclic cavity of TRAP and, therefore, must be complexed by one or more side chain bisphosphonates. Although the primary chelation site of TRAP possesses excellent Ga(III) complexing properties [12], it apparently cannot compete with the bisphosphonates. In 68 Ga-TRAP(MDP)3 and 68 Ga-TRAP(PDP)3, TRAP thus merely serves as a scaffold, and its ability for 68 Ga binding is not required. We therefore conclude that in designing bisphosphonate tracers for 68 Ga-based PET bone imaging, the introduction of chelating moieties other than the bisphosphonates themselves might be unnecessary. Rather, it appears to be sufficient to equip suitable branched scaffolds with multiple bisphosphonate units which serve both 68 Ga-binding and bone-targeting purposes.

Abbreviations

ESI-MS: electrospray mass spectroscopy; HEPES: 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]-ethanesulfonic acid; MIP: maximum intensity projection; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance; PBS: phosphate buffered saline; PET: positron emission tomography; TRAP: triazacyclononane-phosphinate.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JN developed the study concept; performed synthesis, radiolabeling, PET imaging, and PET data analysis; and wrote the manuscript. JP performed all NMR measurements and evaluated the data. HJW provided important advice in the conception of the study, gave advice in the interpretation of the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  18 in total

1.  TRAP, a powerful and versatile framework for gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Johannes Notni; Jakub Šimeček; Petr Hermann; Hans-Jürgen Wester
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 2.  Bisphosphonates: molecular mechanisms of action and effects on bone cells, monocytes and macrophages.

Authors:  A J Roelofs; K Thompson; F H Ebetino; M J Rogers; F P Coxon
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 3.  The relationship between the chemistry and biological activity of the bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Frank H Ebetino; Anne-Marie L Hogan; Shuting Sun; Maria K Tsoumpra; Xuchen Duan; James T Triffitt; Aaron A Kwaasi; James E Dunford; Bobby L Barnett; Udo Oppermann; Mark W Lundy; Alan Boyde; Boris A Kashemirov; Charles E McKenna; R Graham G Russell
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  A bisphosphonate monoamide analogue of DOTA: a potential agent for bone targeting.

Authors:  Vojtech Kubícek; Jakub Rudovský; Jan Kotek; Petr Hermann; Luce Vander Elst; Robert N Muller; Zvonimir I Kolar; Hubert Th Wolterbeek; Joop A Peters; Ivan Lukes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Gallium uptake by transferrin and interaction with receptor 1.

Authors:  Zohra Chikh; Nguyêt-Thanh Ha-Duong; Geneviève Miquel; Jean-Michel El Hage Chahine
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  A triazacyclononane-based bifunctional phosphinate ligand for the preparation of multimeric 68Ga tracers for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Johannes Notni; Petr Hermann; Jana Havlícková; Jan Kotek; Vojtech Kubícek; Jan Plutnar; Natalia Loktionova; Patrick Johannes Riss; Frank Rösch; Ivan Lukes
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Complexation of metal ions with TRAP (1,4,7-triazacyclononane phosphinic acid) ligands and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid: phosphinate-containing ligands as unique chelators for trivalent gallium.

Authors:  Jakub Šimeček; Martin Schulz; Johannes Notni; Jan Plutnar; Vojtěch Kubíček; Jana Havlíčková; Petr Hermann
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 8.  Osteogenesis imperfecta: questions and answers.

Authors:  Jay R Shapiro; Paul D Sponsellor
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.856

9.  NMR investigations of the static and dynamic structures of bisphosphonates on human bone: a molecular model.

Authors:  Sujoy Mukherjee; Yongcheng Song; Eric Oldfield
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Thermodynamics of bisphosphonates binding to human bone: a two-site model.

Authors:  Sujoy Mukherjee; Cancan Huang; Francisco Guerra; Ke Wang; Eric Oldfield
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  8 in total

1.  Investigations on the Ga(III) Complex of EOB-DTPA and Its 68Ga Radiolabeled Analogue.

Authors:  Julia Greiser; Tobias Niksch; Wolfgang Weigand; Martin Freesmeyer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Clinical applications of Gallium-68.

Authors:  Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Comparative gallium-68 labeling of TRAP-, NOTA-, and DOTA-peptides: practical consequences for the future of gallium-68-PET.

Authors:  Johannes Notni; Karolin Pohle; Hans-Jürgen Wester
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Development of novel radiogallium-labeled bone imaging agents using oligo-aspartic acid peptides as carriers.

Authors:  Kazuma Ogawa; Atsushi Ishizaki; Kenichiro Takai; Yoji Kitamura; Tatsuto Kiwada; Kazuhiro Shiba; Akira Odani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Progress in Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy. What We Learned about Recoils Release from In Vivo Generators.

Authors:  Ján Kozempel; Olga Mokhodoeva; Martin Vlk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Click-Chemistry (CuAAC) Trimerization of an αv β6 Integrin Targeting Ga-68-Peptide: Enhanced Contrast for in-Vivo PET Imaging of Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Xenografts.

Authors:  Neil Gerard Quigley; Stefano Tomassi; Francesco Saviero Di Leva; Salvatore Di Maro; Frauke Richter; Katja Steiger; Susanne Kossatz; Luciana Marinelli; Johannes Notni
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.164

7.  [68Ga]Ga-THP-Pam: A Bisphosphonate PET Tracer with Facile Radiolabeling and Broad Calcium Mineral Affinity.

Authors:  George P Keeling; Billie Sherin; Jana Kim; Belinda San Juan; Tilmann Grus; Thomas R Eykyn; Frank Rösch; Gareth E Smith; Philip J Blower; Samantha Y A Terry; Rafael T M de Rosales
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  Evaluation of Ga-DOTA-(D-Asp)n as bone imaging agents: D-aspartic acid peptides as carriers to bone.

Authors:  Kazuma Ogawa; Atsushi Ishizaki; Kenichiro Takai; Yoji Kitamura; Akira Makino; Takashi Kozaka; Yasushi Kiyono; Kazuhiro Shiba; Akira Odani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.