Literature DB >> 22463939

Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in a patient with bilateral Ménière's disease.

Laura K Holden, J Gail Neely, Brenda D Gotter, Karen M Mispagel, Jill B Firszt.   

Abstract

This case study describes a 45-yr-old female with bilateral, profound sensorineural hearing loss due to Ménière's disease. She received her first cochlear implant in the right ear in 2008 and the second cochlear implant in the left ear in 2010. The case study examines the enhancement to speech recognition, particularly in noise, provided by bilateral cochlear implants. Speech recognition tests were administered prior to obtaining the second implant and at a number of test intervals following activation of the second device. Speech recognition in quiet and noise as well as localization abilities were assessed in several conditions to determine bilateral benefit and performance differences between ears. The results of the speech recognition testing indicated a substantial improvement in the patient's ability to understand speech in noise and her ability to localize sound when using bilateral cochlear implants compared to using a unilateral implant or an implant and a hearing aid. In addition, the patient reported considerable improvement in her ability to communicate in daily life when using bilateral implants versus a unilateral implant. This case suggests that cochlear implantation is a viable option for patients who have lost their hearing to Ménière's disease even when a number of medical treatments and surgical interventions have been performed to control vertigo. In the case presented, bilateral cochlear implantation was necessary for this patient to communicate successfully at home and at work. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22463939      PMCID: PMC3431798          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.4.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  21 in total

1.  Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Patti L Arndt; Steven J Staller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Theresa H Chisolm; Georgina P Blasco; Leslie J Shinnick; Katie J Ketter; Jean C Krause
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

5.  Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Teymouri; Timothy E Hullar; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Manuela Fina; Margaret Skinner; Joel A Goebel; Jay F Piccirillo; J Gail Neely; Owen Black
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55.

Authors:  T W Tillman; R Carhart
Journal:  Tech Rep SAM-TR       Date:  1966-06

8.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Intratympanic dexamethasone injection effects on transient-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Ismail Yilmaz; Cuneyt Yilmazer; Alper Nabi Erkan; Sundus Gencay Aslan; Levent N Ozluoglu
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  The effect of instantaneous input dynamic range setting on the speech perception of children with the nucleus 24 implant.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Margaret W Skinner; Beth A Holstad; Beverly T Fears; Marie K Richter; Margaret Matusofsky; Christine Brenner; Timothy Holden; Amy Birath; Jerrica L Kettel; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implantation in patients with Meniere's disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Vincent M Desiato; Jaimin J Patel; Shaun A Nguyen; Ted A Meyer; Paul R Lambert
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.